181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25830403)
41. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography.
Rack T; Zabler S; Rack A; Riesemeier H; Nelson K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 23377046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading.
das Neves FD; Verissimo AG; da Silva Neto JP; do Prado CJ; de Araújo CA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 23377080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.
Park JM; Baek CH; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 28291853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Stress distribution in the abutment and retention screw of a single implant supporting a prosthesis with platform switching.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Segura-Mori L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Gago A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e112-21. PubMed ID: 23748329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.
Ibrahim CRM; Sameh A; Askar O
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):331. PubMed ID: 38481220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses.
Akpinar I; Demirel F; Parnas L; Sahin S
Quintessence Int; 1996 Jan; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9063207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Does Abutment Collar Length Affect Abutment Screw Loosening After Cyclic Loading?
Siadat H; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Alikhasi M
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():346-51. PubMed ID: 26237093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
Hecker DM; Eckert SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Alveolar bone stress around implants with different abutment angulation: an FE-analysis of anterior maxilla.
Sadrimanesh R; Siadat H; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Monzavi A; Maurer P; Rashad A
Implant Dent; 2012 Jun; 21(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22513498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.
Wang Q; Zhang ZZ; Bai SZ; Zhang SF
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):469. PubMed ID: 36335327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Load transfer in tilted implants with varying cantilever lengths in an all-on-four situation.
Malhotra AO; Padmanabhan TV; Mohamed K; Natarajan S; Elavia U
Aust Dent J; 2012 Dec; 57(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23186568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]