These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25830403)

  • 61. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure.
    Zincir ÖÖ; Parlar A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):646. PubMed ID: 34915864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
    Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
    Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Influence of Abutment Angle on Implant Strain When Supporting a Distal Extension Removable Partial Dental Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study.
    Hirata K; Takahashi T; Tomita A; Gonda T; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(1):51-53. PubMed ID: 28085980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.
    Dogus SM; Kurtz KS; Watanabe I; Griggs JA
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 20(5):348-54. PubMed ID: 21585587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial denture.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Horowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 8648576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone.
    Mesquita AM; Silva JH; Saraceni CH; Kojima AN; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 27213528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations.
    Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection.
    Merz BR; Hunenbart S; Belser UC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 10960985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Load to failure of different titanium abutments for an internal hexagon implant.
    Yilmaz B; Salaita LG; Seidt JD; Clelland NL; McGlumphy EA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):513-6. PubMed ID: 26050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of Single Off-Axis Implant Placement on Abutment Screw Stability Under Lateral Loading.
    Abou-Obaid AI; Al-Otaibi HN; Akeel RF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):520-6. PubMed ID: 27183060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
    Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Prosthetic platforms in implant dentistry.
    Pita MS; Anchieta RB; Barão VA; Garcia IR; Pedrazzi V; Assunção WG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 22134269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.