These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25831107)

  • 1. Compressive resistance of abutments with different diameters and transmucosal heights in Morse-taper implants.
    Lillo R; Parra C; Fuentes R; Borie E; Engelke W; Beltrán V
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 25831107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of transmucosal height in abutments of single and multiple implant-supported prostheses: a non-linear three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Borie E; Leal E; Orsi IA; Salamanca C; Dias FJ; Weber B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Jan; 21(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 29318899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short implants: Influence of different diameters, torques, and transmucosal heights of straight prosthetic abutments on screw preload loss after cycling.
    da Silva KRN; Teixeira LN; Teixeira ML; Ambrosano GB; Martinez EF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2023 Aug; 131(4):e12937. PubMed ID: 37212743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strain analysis of different diameter Morse taper implants under overloading compressive conditions.
    Castro CG; Zancopé K; Veríssimo C; Soares CJ; Neves FD
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Pinés-Hueso J; deLlanos-Lanchares H; del Rio Highsmith J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of the Prosthetic Index on Fracture Resistance of Morse Taper Dental Implants.
    Zancopé K; Dias Resende CC; Castro CG; Salatti RC; Domingues das Neves F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1333-1337. PubMed ID: 29140377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone.
    Mesquita AM; Silva JH; Saraceni CH; Kojima AN; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 27213528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental and computational investigation of Morse taper conometric system reliability for the definition of fixed connections between dental implants and prostheses.
    Bressan E; Lops D; Tomasi C; Ricci S; Stocchero M; Carniel EL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jul; 228(7):674-81. PubMed ID: 25057094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
    Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G; Okamura M; Muñoz CA
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments.
    Moris IC; Faria AC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 4(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22977724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.