551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832091)
1. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation dose escalation based on FDG-PET driven dose painting by numbers in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison between TomoTherapy-HA and RapidArc.
Differding S; Sterpin E; Hermand N; Vanstraelen B; Nuyts S; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Lee JA; Grégoire V
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Mar; 12(1):59. PubMed ID: 28335778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Superiority in Robustness of Multifield Optimization Over Single-Field Optimization for Pencil-Beam Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Carcinoma: An Enhanced Robustness Analysis.
Stützer K; Lin A; Kirk M; Lin L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Nov; 99(3):738-749. PubMed ID: 29280468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is there a single spot size and grid for intensity modulated proton therapy? Simulation of head and neck, prostate and mesothelioma cases.
Widesott L; Lomax AJ; Schwarz M
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 22380362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer.
Duprez F; De Neve W; De Gersem W; Coghe M; Madani I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(4):1045-55. PubMed ID: 20643512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose-painting with protons vs. photons for head-and-neck cancer.
Håkansson K; Smulders B; Specht L; Zhu M; Friborg J; Rasmussen JH; Bentzen SM; Vogelius IR
Acta Oncol; 2020 May; 59(5):525-533. PubMed ID: 31964199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodology for adaptive and robust FDG-PET escalated dose painting by numbers in head and neck tumors.
Differding S; Sterpin E; Janssens G; Hanin FX; Lee JA; Grégoire V
Acta Oncol; 2016; 55(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 26079436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term outcome of
Berwouts D; Madani I; Duprez F; Olteanu AL; Vercauteren T; Boterberg T; Deron P; Bonte K; Huvenne W; De Neve W; Goethals I
Head Neck; 2017 Nov; 39(11):2264-2275. PubMed ID: 28833829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
