These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832187)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25832187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-order errors and standard-position effects in duration discrimination: An experimental study and an analysis by the sensation-weighting model.
    Hellström Å; Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2409-23. PubMed ID: 26082151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges.
    Hellström A; Rammsayer TH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004 May; 116(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15111227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of type of interval, sensory modality, base duration, and psychophysical task on the discrimination of brief time intervals.
    Rammsayer TH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1185-96. PubMed ID: 24596081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intramodal and crossmodal pairing and anchoring in comparisons of successive stimuli.
    Hellström Å; Cederström C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1197-211. PubMed ID: 24604542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus order on duration discrimination sensitivity are under attentional control.
    Dyjas O; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 23895391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of temporal aspects in auditory temporal processing tests].
    Murphy CF; Schochat E
    Pro Fono; 2007; 19(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 17934601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of temporal integration in auditory stream segregation.
    Simon J; Winkler I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 30024224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decay of internal reference information in duration discrimination: Intertrial interval modulates the Type B effect.
    Ellinghaus R; Gick M; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1578-1586. PubMed ID: 30282525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of brief gaps marked by two stimuli: effects of sound length, repetition, and rhythmic grouping.
    Kuroda T; Hasuo E; Grondin S
    Perception; 2013; 42(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 23678618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-attentive discriminability of sound order as a function of tone duration and interstimulus interval: a mismatch negativity study.
    Tervaniemi M; Radil T; Radilova J; Kujala T; Näätänen R
    Audiol Neurootol; 1999; 4(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 10516390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of two neighboring intra- and intermodal empty time intervals marked by three successive stimuli.
    Kuroda T; Hasuo E; Labonté K; Laflamme V; Grondin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():134-41. PubMed ID: 24360622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models.
    Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociative patterns of foreperiod effects in temporal discrimination and reaction time tasks.
    Los SA; Horoufchin H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):1009-20. PubMed ID: 21213194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sound-marker durations on rhythm perception.
    Hasuo E; Nakajima Y; Hirose Y
    Perception; 2011; 40(2):220-42. PubMed ID: 21650095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.
    Lapid E; Ulrich R; Rammsayer T
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):291-305. PubMed ID: 18372750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploiting temporal predictability: Event-related potential correlates of task-supportive temporal cue processing in auditory distraction.
    Volosin M; Grimm S; Horváth J
    Brain Res; 2016 May; 1639():120-31. PubMed ID: 26947619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.