These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832193)

  • 21. Attentional capture by a color singleton is stronger at spatially relevant than irrelevant locations: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Su Y; Huang W; Yang N; Yan K; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Oct; 57(10):e13640. PubMed ID: 33460208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.
    Arnott SR; Pratt J; Shore DI; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Dec; 12(3):383-95. PubMed ID: 11689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 22016048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Top-down suppression of negative features applies flexibly contingent on visual search goals.
    Forstinger M; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1120-1147. PubMed ID: 38627277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contingent capture by color is sensitive to categorical color perception.
    Mihajlović N; Zdravković S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37985593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing a priming account of the contingent-capture effect.
    Schoeberl T; Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1262-1282. PubMed ID: 30820777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
    Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A finer-grained search reveals no evidence of the attentional capture by to-be-ignored features.
    Rheem H; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2441-2457. PubMed ID: 33913088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Towards a resolution of the attentional-capture debate.
    Carmel T; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1772-82. PubMed ID: 26280266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
    Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.
    Liao HI; Yeh SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional repulsion effects produced by feature-guided shifts of attention.
    Baumeler D; Nako R; Born S; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2020 Mar; 20(3):10. PubMed ID: 32232375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What is top-down about contingent capture?
    Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hidden from view: Statistical learning exposes latent attentional capture.
    Hilchey MD; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1633-1640. PubMed ID: 31152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Capture by colour: evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture.
    Harris AM; Becker SI; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2305-21. PubMed ID: 26018643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.