These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832330)

  • 1. The impact of secondary pests on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops.
    Catarino R; Ceddia G; Areal FJ; Park J
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Jun; 13(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 25832330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy.
    Kumar S; Chandra A; Pandey KC
    J Environ Biol; 2008 Sep; 29(5):641-53. PubMed ID: 19295059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates.
    Marvier M; McCreedy C; Regetz J; Kareiva P
    Science; 2007 Jun; 316(5830):1475-7. PubMed ID: 17556584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China.
    Lu Y; Wu K; Jiang Y; Xia B; Li P; Feng H; Wyckhuys KA; Guo Y
    Science; 2010 May; 328(5982):1151-4. PubMed ID: 20466880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invasion of pests resistant to Bt toxins can lead to inherent non-uniqueness in genetically modified Bt-plant dynamics: mathematical modeling.
    Medvinsky AB; Gonik MM; Li BL; Velkov VV; Malchow H
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 16757001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.
    Shelton AM; Zhao JZ; Roush RT
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2002; 47():845-81. PubMed ID: 11729093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safety and advantages of Bacillus thuringiensis-protected plants to control insect pests.
    Betz FS; Hammond BG; Fuchs RL
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):156-73. PubMed ID: 11067772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non-target organisms.
    Yu HL; Li YH; Wu KM
    J Integr Plant Biol; 2011 Jul; 53(7):520-38. PubMed ID: 21564541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.
    Lacey LA; Grzywacz D; Shapiro-Ilan DI; Frutos R; Brownbridge M; Goettel MS
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2015 Nov; 132():1-41. PubMed ID: 26225455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulatory considerations surrounding the deployment of Bt-expressing cowpea in Africa: report of the deliberations of an expert panel.
    Huesing J; Romeis J; Ellstrand N; Raybould A; Hellmich R; Wolt J; Ehlers J; Dabiré C; Fatokun C; Hokanson K; Ishiyaku MF; Margam V; Obokoh N; Mignouna J; Nangayo F; Ouedraogo J; Pasquet R; Pittendrigh B; Schaal B; Stein J; Tamò M; Murdock L
    GM Crops; 2011; 2(3):211-24. PubMed ID: 22179194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins overcomes insect resistance.
    Badran AH; Guzov VM; Huai Q; Kemp MM; Vishwanath P; Kain W; Nance AM; Evdokimov A; Moshiri F; Turner KH; Wang P; Malvar T; Liu DR
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7601):58-63. PubMed ID: 27120167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries.
    Qaim M; Zilberman D
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5608):900-2. PubMed ID: 12574633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field-evolved insect resistance to Bt crops: definition, theory, and data.
    Tabashnik BE; Van Rensburg JB; Carrière Y
    J Econ Entomol; 2009 Dec; 102(6):2011-25. PubMed ID: 20069826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of transgenic soybean exhibiting high expression of a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis cry1A transgene for suppressing lepidopteran population densities and crop injury.
    McPherson RM; MacRae TC
    J Econ Entomol; 2009 Aug; 102(4):1640-8. PubMed ID: 19736779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms.
    O'Callaghan M; Glare TR; Burgess EP; Malone LA
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2005; 50():271-92. PubMed ID: 15355241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sustained susceptibility of pink bollworm to Bt cotton in the United States.
    Tabashnik BE; Morin S; Unnithan GC; Yelich AJ; Ellers-Kirk C; Harpold VS; Sisterson MS; Ellsworth PC; Dennehy TJ; Antilla L; Liesner L; Whitlow M; Staten RT; Fabrick JA; Li X; Carrière Y
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 22572905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops.
    De Schrijver A; De Clercq P; de Maagd RA; van Frankenhuyzen K
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2015 Dec; 13(9):1221-3. PubMed ID: 26032006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of Insect Pests with Bt Crops in the United States.
    Gassmann AJ; Reisig DD
    Annu Rev Entomol; 2023 Jan; 68():31-49. PubMed ID: 36170641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field-evolved resistance to Bt maize by western corn rootworm: predictions from the laboratory and effects in the field.
    Gassmann AJ
    J Invertebr Pathol; 2012 Jul; 110(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 22537837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control.
    Roh JY; Choi JY; Li MS; Jin BR; Je YH
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 18051264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.