BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832512)

  • 1. Forensic issues in medical evaluation: competency and end-of-life issues.
    Soliman S; Hall RC
    Adv Psychosom Med; 2015; 34():36-48. PubMed ID: 25832512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competency for creation, use, and revocation of psychiatric advance directives.
    Srebnik DS; Kim SY
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(4):501-10. PubMed ID: 17185480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surrogate decision making. Who will make decisions for me when I can't?
    High DM
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1994 Aug; 10(3):445-62. PubMed ID: 7982161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A philosophical discussion of end-of-life decision-making methods for incompetent patients.
    Edwards D
    Int J Palliat Nurs; 2002 Mar; 8(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 11923743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events--part I: decision-making capacity, surrogates, and advance directives.
    Limehouse WE; Feeser VR; Bookman KJ; Derse A
    Acad Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 19(9):E1068-72. PubMed ID: 22978734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chapter 765 revisited: Florida's new advance directives law.
    Calder M
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 20(2):291-365. PubMed ID: 16001475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives.
    Kim SY; Appelbaum PS
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 16883617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advance directives, future selves and decision-making.
    Maclean AR
    Med Law Rev; 2006; 14(3):291-320. PubMed ID: 16901976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a patient preference predictor to help make medical decisions for incapacitated patients.
    Rid A; Wendler D
    J Med Philos; 2014 Apr; 39(2):104-29. PubMed ID: 24526785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Capacity for Preferences: Respecting Patients with Compromised Decision-Making.
    Wasserman JA; Navin MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 May; 48(3):31-39. PubMed ID: 29806903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surrogate health care laws help hospitals.
    Hudson T
    Hospitals; 1992 Apr; 66(8):52-3. PubMed ID: 1559683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The challenge of end-of-life decisions.
    Fade AE
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1995 May; 18(5):63. PubMed ID: 10142838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advance patient directives: preserving consumer choice.
    Renick O; Hanson S; Nelson M
    Med Interface; 1994 Apr; 7(4):84-7 contd. PubMed ID: 10133362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Values anamnesis: a narrative approach to determining and interpreting advance directives].
    Kielstein R; Sass HM
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(6):125-9. PubMed ID: 9214148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of guardianship laws and surrogate decision-making practices in China, Japan, Thailand and Australia: a review by the Asia Consortium, International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) capacity taskforce.
    Tsoh J; Peisah C; Narumoto J; Wongpakaran N; Wongpakaran T; O'Neill N; Jiang T; Ogano S; Mimura M; Kato Y; Chiu H
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2015 Jun; 27(6):1029-37. PubMed ID: 25573420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competency assessment of medical and psychiatric patients under Maryland's Health Care Decisions Act.
    Janofsky JS
    Md Med J; 1995 Feb; 44(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 7898287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate decision makers for incompetent ICU patients: a European perspective.
    Lautrette A; Peigne V; Watts J; Souweine B; Azoulay E
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2008 Dec; 14(6):714-9. PubMed ID: 19005315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting New York State's proposed surrogate decision-making legislation.
    Schwarz JK
    J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1995 Sep; 26(3):18-23. PubMed ID: 8699280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dementia and the law in Connecticut.
    Coll PP; McEvoy K
    Conn Med; 2013 May; 77(5):275-9. PubMed ID: 23777039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advance directives, best interests and clinical judgement: shifting sands at the end of life.
    Samanta A; Samanta J
    Clin Med (Lond); 2006; 6(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 16826861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.