188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832624)
1. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moojen WA; Peul WC
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1664. PubMed ID: 25832624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive spinal surgery and spinal stenosis.
Arnold PM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 25635634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Huddleston P
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(22):1889. PubMed ID: 26582619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Point of view.
Lurie JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):86. PubMed ID: 25569525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Moojen WA; Van der Gaag NA
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):681-4. PubMed ID: 27659170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar stenosis and disc herniation.
Armin SS; Holly LT; Khoo LT
Neurosurg Focus; 2008; 25(2):E11. PubMed ID: 18673040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regarding: long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild for spinal stenosis.
Tumialán LM; Marciano FF; Theodore N
Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):252; author reply 252-3. PubMed ID: 22390527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].
Korge A; Mehren C; Ruetten S
Orthopade; 2019 Oct; 48(10):824-830. PubMed ID: 31053867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression for lumbar stenosis: review of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.
Johans SJ; Amin BY; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Sci; 2015 Mar; 59(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 25370820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression with MIS TLIF.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV
World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):646-7. PubMed ID: 25153294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis: Predictive factors of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Iwahashi H; Simpson AK; Yamada H; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Kagotani R; Sonekatsu M; Sasaki T; Shinto K; Deguchi T
J Orthop Sci; 2017 May; 22(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28161236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regarding: Dr. Tumialán et al. in response to "Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild® for spinal stenosis".
Benyamin RM; Vallejo R
Pain Pract; 2012 Jul; 12(6):498. PubMed ID: 22758601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Lawrence MM; Hayek SM
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 26(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 23963231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
