200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25832739)
1. Mental juggling: when does multitasking impair reading comprehension?
Cho KW; Altarriba J; Popiel M
J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):90-105. PubMed ID: 25832739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The neural substrates associated with attentional resources and difficulty of concurrent processing of the two verbal tasks.
Mizuno K; Tanaka M; Tanabe HC; Sadato N; Watanabe Y
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 22571931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inference comprehension in text reading: Performance of individuals with right- versus left-hemisphere lesions and the influence of cognitive functions.
Silagi ML; Radanovic M; Conforto AB; Mendonça LIZ; Mansur LL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197195. PubMed ID: 29795602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Questioning and reading goals: information-seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions.
Ishiwa K; Sanjosé V; Otero J
Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Sep; 83(Pt 3):502-20. PubMed ID: 23822534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.
Borst JP; Taatgen NA; van Rijn H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):363-82. PubMed ID: 20192536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: the effects of task and idiom type.
Papagno C; Caporali A
Brain Lang; 2007 Feb; 100(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 16487581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of advance questions on reading comprehension.
Kreiner DS
J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):352-64. PubMed ID: 9042744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can you accurately monitor your behaviors while multitasking? The effect of multitasking on metacognition.
Guo R; Liu Y; Lu HJ; Jing A
Psychol Res; 2024 Mar; 88(2):580-593. PubMed ID: 37707650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.
Feng S; D'Mello S; Graesser AC
Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 23288660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of working memory updating, inhibition, fluid intelligence, and reading comprehension in explaining differences between consistent and inconsistent arithmetic word-problem-solving performance.
Passolunghi MC; De Blas GD; Carretti B; Gomez-Veiga I; Doz E; Garcia-Madruga JA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Dec; 224():105512. PubMed ID: 35901670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influencing the occurrence of mind wandering while reading.
Kopp K; D'Mello S; Mills C
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Jul; 34():52-62. PubMed ID: 25840360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of sudden-onset distractors on reading efficiency and comprehension.
Luke SG; Jensen T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1195-1206. PubMed ID: 35670738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks.
Cao S; Liu Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():46-54. PubMed ID: 23764876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Activations of "motor" and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension.
Stowe LA; Paans AM; Wijers AA; Zwarts F
Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 15068911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of age on processing and storage in working memory span tasks and reading comprehension.
Schroeder PJ
Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):308-31. PubMed ID: 24785593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interruption-similarity effects during discourse processing.
Ledoux K; Gordon PC
Memory; 2006 Oct; 14(7):789-803. PubMed ID: 16938692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of auditory distraction on reading comprehension: An individual differences investigation.
Hao H; Conway ARA
Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):852-863. PubMed ID: 34623604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distractions, distractions: does instant messaging affect college students' performance on a concurrent reading comprehension task?
Fox AB; Rosen J; Crawford M
Cyberpsychol Behav; 2009 Feb; 12(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 19006461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Easy-to-read texts for students with intellectual disability: linguistic factors affecting comprehension.
Fajardo I; Ávila V; Ferrer A; Tavares G; Gómez M; Hernández A
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2014 May; 27(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 23813583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of seductive details evidenced by gaze duration.
Chang Y; Choi S
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Mar; 109():131-8. PubMed ID: 24445112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
