These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25833896)

  • 1. Mean glandular dose in six digital mammography services in Santiago, Chile: preliminary reference levels.
    Leyton F; Nogueira Mdo S; Dantas M; Duran MP; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):115-20. PubMed ID: 25833896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography.
    Kawaguchi A; Matsunaga Y; Otsuka T; Suzuki S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jan; 7(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 24234736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
    Yakoumakis E; Tzamicha E; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems.
    Muhogora WE; Devetti A; Padovani R; Msaki P; Bonutti F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):231-6. PubMed ID: 18283065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts.
    Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):N1-7. PubMed ID: 25500435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.
    Sommer A; Schopphoven S; Land I; Blaser D; Sobczak T;
    Rofo; 2014 May; 186(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 24557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3).
    Mora P; Blanco S; Khoury H; Leyton F; Cárdenas J; Defaz MY; Garay F; Telón F; Aguilar JG; Roas N; Gamarra M; Blanco D; Quintero AR; Nader A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24993012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of a European dose survey for mammography.
    Michielsen K; Jacobs J; Lemmens K; Nens J; Zoetelief J; Faulkner K; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 18430718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece.
    Kalathaki M; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Tritakis P; Kalyvas N; Simantirakis G; Manousaridis G; Kaisas I; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21821614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CHALLENGES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE OF CR MAMMOGRAPHY IN TANZANIA.
    Jackson J; Muhogora WE; Makundi IN
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 30445643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP; Obenauer S; Marten K; Kehbel S; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system.
    Morán P; Chevalier M; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Vañó E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):375-9. PubMed ID: 15933140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units.
    Hauge IH; Bredholt K; Olerud HM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 23771960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Investigation of quality control and average glandular dose and image quality in digital mammography in Hokkaido].
    Kurowarabi K; Abe H; Horita H; Kaneta K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 21532248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of mean glandular dose values provided by a digital breast tomosynthesis system in Brazil.
    Beraldo Oliveira B; Paixão L; Donato da Silva S; Teixeira MH; Nogueira Mdo S
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Jun; 100():91-5. PubMed ID: 25457188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.