These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25834090)

  • 1. A comparative review of methods for comparing means using partially paired data.
    Guo B; Yuan Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Jun; 26(3):1323-1340. PubMed ID: 25834090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method.
    Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Approaches to Analyzing Continuous Correlated Eye Data When Sample Size Is Small.
    Huang J; Huang J; Chen Y; Ying GS
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 25(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 28891730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing equality of means in partially paired data with incompleteness in single response.
    Qi Q; Yan L; Tian L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1508-1522. PubMed ID: 29618289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unadjusted Bivariate Two-Group Comparisons: When Simpler is Better.
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):338-342. PubMed ID: 29189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group comparisons involving missing data in clinical trials: a comparison of estimates and power (size) for some simple approaches.
    Miller ME; Morgan TM; Espeland MA; Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(16):2383-97. PubMed ID: 11512129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sample size considerations for paired experimental design with incomplete observations of continuous outcomes.
    Zhu H; Xu X; Ahn C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):589-598. PubMed ID: 28956503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inference and sample size calculation for clinical trials with incomplete observations of paired binary outcomes.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 27862151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators.
    Cham H; Reshetnyak E; Rosenfeld B; Breitbart W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):12-30. PubMed ID: 27834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rank-based two-sample tests for paired data with missing values.
    Fong Y; Huang Y; Lemos MP; Mcelrath MJ
    Biostatistics; 2018 Jul; 19(3):281-294. PubMed ID: 28968816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and sample size for the S:T repeated measures design combined with a linear mixed-effects model allowing for missing data.
    Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(6):963-974. PubMed ID: 28319460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum likelihood versus multiple imputation for missing data in small longitudinal samples with nonnormality.
    Shin T; Davison ML; Long JD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):426-449. PubMed ID: 27709974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):224-36. PubMed ID: 18264992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Order-restricted inference for means with missing values.
    Wang H; Zhong PS
    Biometrics; 2017 Sep; 73(3):972-980. PubMed ID: 28182830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal weighted two-sample
    Guo X; Wang Y; Zhou N; Zhu X
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(6):961-976. PubMed ID: 35707734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and analysis of three-arm trials with negative binomially distributed endpoints.
    Mütze T; Munk A; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(4):505-21. PubMed ID: 26388314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Homogeneity testing for binomial proportions under stratified double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
    Qiu SF; Fu QX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3547-3568. PubMed ID: 32640937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of tests for paired lifetime data.
    Wang Z; Ng HK
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2006 Dec; 12(4):505-22. PubMed ID: 17053974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.