BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25834182)

  • 1. Forward problem of electrocardiography: is it solved?
    Bear LR; Cheng LK; LeGrice IJ; Sands GB; Lever NA; Paterson DJ; Smaill BH
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 8(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 25834182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Accurate Is Inverse Electrocardiographic Mapping? A Systematic In Vivo Evaluation.
    Bear LR; LeGrice IJ; Sands GB; Lever NA; Loiselle DS; Paterson DJ; Cheng LK; Smaill BH
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 11(5):e006108. PubMed ID: 29700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The transfer matrix for epicardial potential in a piece-wise homogeneous thorax model: the boundary element formulation.
    Stenroos M
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5443-55. PubMed ID: 19700818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The forward problem of electrocardiography revisited.
    Rudy Y
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 8(3):526-8. PubMed ID: 26082525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The inverse problem in electrocardiography: solutions in terms of epicardial potentials.
    Rudy Y; Messinger-Rapport BJ
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1988; 16(3):215-68. PubMed ID: 3064971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wavefront-based models for inverse electrocardiography.
    Ghodrati A; Brooks DH; Tadmor G; MacLeod RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1821-31. PubMed ID: 16941838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The maximum A posteriori approach to the inverse problem of electrocardiography.
    Bu G; Throne R; Olson L; Windle J
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():158-62. PubMed ID: 12724886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of measured and computed epicardial potentials from a patient-specific inverse model.
    Budgett DM; Monro DM; Edwards SW; Stanbridge RD
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():165-73. PubMed ID: 8189121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility and Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Whole-Heart Inverse Potential Mapping of Sinus Rhythm and Idiopathic Ventricular Foci.
    Bhagirath P; van der Graaf M; van Dongen E; de Hooge J; van Driel V; Ramanna H; de Groot N; Götte MJ
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Oct; 4(10):e002222. PubMed ID: 26467997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of noninvasive reconstruction of epicardial versus transmembrane potentials in consideration of the null space.
    Messnarz B; Seger M; Modre R; Fischer G; Hanser F; Tilg B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1609-18. PubMed ID: 15376509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac anisotropy: is it negligible regarding noninvasive activation time imaging?
    Modre R; Seger M; Fischer G; Hintermüller C; Hayn D; Pfeifer B; Hanser F; Schreier G; Tilg B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 16602563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of torso impedance on epicardial and body surface potentials: a modeling study.
    Buist ML; Pullan AJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jul; 50(7):816-24. PubMed ID: 12848349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental Validation of Noninvasive Epicardial and Endocardial Activation Imaging.
    Oosterhoff P; Meijborg VM; van Dam PM; van Dessel PF; Belterman CN; Streekstra GJ; de Bakker JM; Coronel R; Oostendorp TF
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2016 Aug; 9(8):e004104. PubMed ID: 27439651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Boundary element computations in the forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography: comparison of collocation and Galerkin weightings.
    Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2124-33. PubMed ID: 18713681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of alternans in late potentials. Correlations between epicardial and body surface recordings.
    Romberg D; Patterson H; Theres H; Lander P; Berbari EJ; Baumann G
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():198-201. PubMed ID: 8656111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wavelet-promoted sparsity for non-invasive reconstruction of electrical activity of the heart.
    Cluitmans M; Karel J; Bonizzi P; Volders P; Westra R; Peeters R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Nov; 56(11):2039-2050. PubMed ID: 29752679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved performance of bayesian solutions for inverse electrocardiography using multiple information sources.
    Serinagaoglu Y; Brooks DH; MacLeod RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):2024-34. PubMed ID: 17019867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculating endocardial potentials from epicardial potentials measured during external stimulation.
    Wolf PD; Tang AS; Ideker RE; Pilkington TC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Sep; 39(9):913-20. PubMed ID: 1473819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cardiac motion on solution of the electrocardiography inverse problem.
    Jiang M; Xia L; Shou G; Wei Q; Liu F; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Apr; 56(4):923-31. PubMed ID: 19272916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrocardiographic imaging: II. Effect of torso inhomogeneities on noninvasive reconstruction of epicardial potentials, electrograms, and isochrones.
    Ramanathan C; Rudy Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Feb; 12(2):241-52. PubMed ID: 11232625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.