These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25834947)
1. The challenge of comprehensive and consistent sequence variant interpretation between clinical laboratories. Pepin MG; Murray ML; Bailey S; Leistritz-Kessler D; Schwarze U; Byers PH Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 25834947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shariant platform: Enabling evidence sharing across Australian clinical genetic-testing laboratories to support variant interpretation. Tudini E; Andrews J; Lawrence DM; King-Smith SL; Baker N; Baxter L; Beilby J; Bennetts B; Beshay V; Black M; Boughtwood TF; Brion K; Cheong PL; Christie M; Christodoulou J; Chong B; Cox K; Davis MR; Dejong L; Dinger ME; Doig KD; Douglas E; Dubowsky A; Ellul M; Fellowes A; Fisk K; Fortuno C; Friend K; Gallagher RL; Gao S; Hackett E; Hadler J; Hipwell M; Ho G; Hollway G; Hooper AJ; Kassahn KS; Krishnaraj R; Lau C; Le H; San Leong H; Lundie B; Lunke S; Marty A; McPhillips M; Nguyen LT; Nones K; Palmer K; Pearson JV; Quinn MCJ; Rawlings LH; Sadedin S; Sanchez L; Schreiber AW; Sigalas E; Simsek A; Soubrier J; Stark Z; Thompson BA; U J; Vakulin CG; Wells AV; Wise CA; Woods R; Ziolkowski A; Brion MJ; Scott HS; Thorne NP; Spurdle AB; Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Nov; 109(11):1960-1973. PubMed ID: 36332611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Interlaboratory Variation in the Interpretation of Genomic Test Results in Patients With Epilepsy. SoRelle JA; Pascual JM; Gotway G; Park JY JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203812. PubMed ID: 32347949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Amendola LM; Jarvik GP; Leo MC; McLaughlin HM; Akkari Y; Amaral MD; Berg JS; Biswas S; Bowling KM; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Dulik MC; Ghazani AA; Ghosh R; Green RC; Hart R; Horton C; Johnston JJ; Lebo MS; Milosavljevic A; Ou J; Pak CM; Patel RY; Punj S; Richards CS; Salama J; Strande NT; Yang Y; Plon SE; Biesecker LG; Rehm HL Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jun; 98(6):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 27181684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinically impactful differences in variant interpretation between clinicians and testing laboratories: a single-center experience. Bland A; Harrington EA; Dunn K; Pariani M; Platt JCK; Grove ME; Caleshu C Genet Med; 2018 Mar; 20(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 29240077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessment of Genomic Sequence Variation to Harmonize Interpretation for Personalized Medicine. Garber KB; Vincent LM; Alexander JJ; Bean LJH; Bale S; Hegde M Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Nov; 99(5):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 27843123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility and Outcomes of the 2019 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Clinical Genome Resource Guidelines for Interpretation of Copy Number Variants with Borderline Classifications at an Academic Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory. Drackley A; Brew C; Wlodaver A; Spencer S; Leuer K; Rathbun P; Charrow J; Wieneke X; Yap KL; Ing A J Mol Diagn; 2022 Oct; 24(10):1100-1111. PubMed ID: 35868509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adopting High-Resolution Allele Frequencies Substantially Expedites Variant Interpretation in Genetic Diagnostic Laboratories. Ghani M; Nfonsam L; Pranckeviciene E; Daoud H; Potter R; Chisholm C; Harper PE; Schaffer A; Little L; Sinclair-Bourque E; McGowan-Jordan J; Smith A; Bronicki L; Jarinova O J Mol Diagn; 2019 Jul; 21(4):602-611. PubMed ID: 31028938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reinterpretation of sequence variants: one diagnostic laboratory's experience, and the need for standard guidelines. Chisholm C; Daoud H; Ghani M; Mettler G; McGowan-Jordan J; Sinclair-Bourque L; Smith A; Jarinova O Genet Med; 2018 Mar; 20(3):365-368. PubMed ID: 29240080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories. O'Daniel JM; McLaughlin HM; Amendola LM; Bale SJ; Berg JS; Bick D; Bowling KM; Chao EC; Chung WK; Conlin LK; Cooper GM; Das S; Deignan JL; Dorschner MO; Evans JP; Ghazani AA; Goddard KA; Gornick M; Farwell Hagman KD; Hambuch T; Hegde M; Hindorff LA; Holm IA; Jarvik GP; Knight Johnson A; Mighion L; Morra M; Plon SE; Punj S; Richards CS; Santani A; Shirts BH; Spinner NB; Tang S; Weck KE; Wolf SM; Yang Y; Rehm HL Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 27811861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Novel findings with reassessment of exome data: implications for validation testing and interpretation of genomic data. Gibson KM; Nesbitt A; Cao K; Yu Z; Denenberg E; DeChene E; Guan Q; Bhoj E; Zhou X; Zhang B; Wu C; Dubbs H; Wilkens A; Medne L; Bedoukian E; White PS; Pennington J; Luo M; Conlin L; Monos D; Sarmady M; Marsh E; Zackai E; Spinner N; Krantz I; Deardorff M; Santani A Genet Med; 2018 Mar; 20(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 29389922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conflicting Interpretation of Genetic Variants and Cancer Risk by Commercial Laboratories as Assessed by the Prospective Registry of Multiplex Testing. Balmaña J; Digiovanni L; Gaddam P; Walsh MF; Joseph V; Stadler ZK; Nathanson KL; Garber JE; Couch FJ; Offit K; Robson ME; Domchek SM J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 34(34):4071-4078. PubMed ID: 27621404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants. Brandt T; Sack LM; Arjona D; Tan D; Mei H; Cui H; Gao H; Bean LJH; Ankala A; Del Gaudio D; Knight Johnson A; Vincent LM; Reavey C; Lai A; Richard G; Meck JM Genet Med; 2020 Feb; 22(2):336-344. PubMed ID: 31534211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A taxonomic schema of potential pitfalls in clinical variant analysis based on real-world evidence. Coovadia A; Boccuto L; Chang Y; DeLuca J PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0295010. PubMed ID: 38032981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using large sequencing data sets to refine intragenic disease regions and prioritize clinical variant interpretation. Amr SS; Al Turki SH; Lebo M; Sarmady M; Rehm HL; Abou Tayoun AN Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):496-504. PubMed ID: 27657688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies. Amendola LM; Muenzen K; Biesecker LG; Bowling KM; Cooper GM; Dorschner MO; Driscoll C; Foreman AKM; Golden-Grant K; Greally JM; Hindorff L; Kanavy D; Jobanputra V; Johnston JJ; Kenny EE; McNulty S; Murali P; Ou J; Powell BC; Rehm HL; Rolf B; Roman TS; Van Ziffle J; Guha S; Abhyankar A; Crosslin D; Venner E; Yuan B; Zouk H; ; Jarvik GP Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Nov; 107(5):932-941. PubMed ID: 33108757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]