These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25835573)

  • 1. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
    Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.
    Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design.
    Wang E; Sun H; Wang J; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhang JZH; Hou T
    Chem Rev; 2019 Aug; 119(16):9478-9508. PubMed ID: 31244000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
    Wang J; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes.
    Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.
    Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.
    Misini Ignjatović M; Caldararu O; Dong G; Muñoz-Gutierrez C; Adasme-Carreño F; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):707-730. PubMed ID: 27565797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
    Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes.
    Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches.
    Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening.
    Virtanen SI; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():303-318. PubMed ID: 26550792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA.
    Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An accurate free energy estimator: based on MM/PBSA combined with interaction entropy for protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Huang K; Luo S; Cong Y; Zhong S; Zhang JZH; Duan L
    Nanoscale; 2020 May; 12(19):10737-10750. PubMed ID: 32388542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
    Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 1: Evaluation of ABCG2 charge model on solvation free energy prediction and optimization of atom radii suitable for more accurate solvation free energy prediction by the PBSA method.
    Sun Y; He X; Hou T; Cai L; Man VH; Wang J
    J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(14):1334-1346. PubMed ID: 36807356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 83.