194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25836004)
1. Hounsfield unit change in root and alveolar bone during canine retraction.
Jiang F; Liu SS; Xia Z; Li S; Chen J; Kula KS; Eckert G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 25836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical environment change in root, periodontal ligament, and alveolar bone in response to two canine retraction treatment strategies.
Jiang F; Xia Z; Li S; Eckert G; Chen J
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Apr; 18 Suppl 1(0 1):29-38. PubMed ID: 25865531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional assessment of the eruption path of the canine in individuals with bone-grafted alveolar clefts using cone beam computed tomography.
Oberoi S; Gill P; Chigurupati R; Hoffman WY; Hatcher DC; Vargervik K
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Sep; 47(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 20184425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment.
Hsu JT; Chang HW; Huang HL; Yu JH; Li YF; Tu MG
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 20393863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of Hounsfield units in cone-beam computed tomography.
Vitral RW; Fraga MR; da Silva Campos MJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):204. PubMed ID: 26232821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects of corticotomy approaches on dentoalveolar structures during canine retraction: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yang C; Wang C; Deng F; Fan Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):457-65. PubMed ID: 26321344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional evaluation of root dimensions and alveolar ridge width of maxillary lateral incisors in patients with unilateral agenesis.
AlRushaid S; Chandhoke T; Utreja A; Tadinada A; Allareddy V; Uribe F
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):30. PubMed ID: 27641422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical properties of root cementum: part 14. The amount of root resorption after force application for 12 weeks on maxillary and mandibular premolars: a microcomputed-tomography study.
Paetyangkul A; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Jones AS; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):492.e1-9; discussion 492-3. PubMed ID: 19815148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Orthodontic Treatment Affect the Alveolar Bone Density?
Yu JH; Huang HL; Liu CF; Wu J; Li YF; Tsai MT; Hsu JT
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(10):e3080. PubMed ID: 26962841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of alveolar ridge width and height changes after orthodontic space opening in patients with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
Uribe F; Padala S; Allareddy V; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):848-59. PubMed ID: 24286908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional canine displacement patterns in response to translation and controlled tipping retraction strategies.
Li S; Xia Z; Liu SS; Eckert G; Chen J
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 24885592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Authors' response.
Chen J; Jiang F; Liu SS; Li S; Kula KS; Eckert G; Xia Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):204-5. PubMed ID: 26232822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ahn HW; Moon SC; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2013 Mar; 83(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 23066654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction.
Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial.
Al-Naoum F; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1880-9. PubMed ID: 25128922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional finite element analysis to evaluate biomechanical effects of different alveolar decortication approaches on rate of canine retraction.
Gupta S; Ahuja S; Bhambri E; Jaura BS; Ahuja V
Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):216-226. PubMed ID: 31000446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
