These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25836011)

  • 1. Digital casts in orthodontics: a comparison of 4 software systems.
    Westerlund A; Tancredi W; Ransjö M; Bresin A; Psonis S; Torgersson O
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25836011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Virtual study models: a comparison of modular application systems.
    Favero L; Terrazzani C; Favero V; Stellini E; Cocilovo F
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(2):16-25. PubMed ID: 20545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of standardization on the precision (reproducibility) of dental cast analysis with virtual 3-dimensional models.
    Hayashi K; Chung O; Park S; Lee SP; Sachdeva RC; Mizoguchi I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 25726405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliabilities of 3-dimensional orthodontic digital setups.
    Fabels LN; Nijkamp PG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 25432262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-assisted orthodontic treatment: the SureSmile process.
    Mah J; Sachdeva R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 11455383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Novel Methodology to Validate the Accuracy of Extraoral Dental Scanners and Digital Articulation Systems.
    Ellakwa A; Elnajar S; Littlefair D; Sara G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 May; 26(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 29722937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of digital images derived from toothprints thermoplastic bite impression wafers.
    Tesini D; Thompson T
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2005; 53(4):46-8. PubMed ID: 15828606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era.
    Joffe L
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 15608352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sure-Smile: technology-driven solution for orthodontics.
    Sachdeva R
    Tex Dent J; 2002 Jul; 119(7):608-15. PubMed ID: 12138533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.