These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Analytical and experimental performance evaluation of an integrated Si-photonic balanced coherent receiver in a colorless scenario. Morsy-Osman M; Chagnon M; Xu X; Zhuge Q; Poulin M; Painchaud Y; Pelletier M; Paquet C; Plant DV Opt Express; 2014 Mar; 22(5):5693-730. PubMed ID: 24663910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speckle contrast reduction through the use of a modally-specific photonic lantern for optical coherence tomography. Maltais-Tariant R; Itzamna Becerra-Deana R; Brais-Brunet S; Dehaes M; Boudoux C Biomed Opt Express; 2023 Dec; 14(12):6250-6259. PubMed ID: 38420311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A high signal-to-noise ratio balanced detector system for 2 μm coherent wind lidar. Wang R; Chen L; Zhao Y; Jin G Rev Sci Instrum; 2020 Jul; 91(7):073101. PubMed ID: 32752857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient multi-mode to single-mode coupling in a photonic lantern. Noordegraaf D; Skovgaard PM; Nielsen MD; Bland-Hawthorn J Opt Express; 2009 Feb; 17(3):1988-94. PubMed ID: 19189029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coherent Doppler lidar signal covariance including wind shear and wind turbulence. Frehlich R Appl Opt; 1994 Sep; 33(27):6472-81. PubMed ID: 20941185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analyzing the performance of pseudo-random single photon counting ranging Lidar. Yu Y; Liu B; Chen Z Appl Opt; 2018 Sep; 57(27):7733-7739. PubMed ID: 30462035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photonic lantern adaptive spatial mode control in LMA fiber amplifiers. Montoya J; Aleshire C; Hwang C; Fontaine NK; Velázquez-Benítez A; Martz DH; Fan TY; Ripin D Opt Express; 2016 Feb; 24(4):3405-13. PubMed ID: 26906999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of phase-induced intensity noise in a fiber-based coherent Doppler lidar using polarization control. Rodrigo PJ; Pedersen C Opt Express; 2010 Mar; 18(5):5320-7. PubMed ID: 20389545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of IPDA lidar receiver sensitivity for coherent detection and for direct detection using sine-wave and pulsed modulation. Sun X; Abshire JB Opt Express; 2012 Sep; 20(19):21291-304. PubMed ID: 23037252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimum local oscillator levels for coherent detection using photoconductors. Hunt JM; Holmes JF; Amzajerdian F Appl Opt; 1988 Aug; 27(15):3135-41. PubMed ID: 20531905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Probabilistic Approach to Estimating Allowed SNR Values for Automotive LiDARs in "Smart Cities" under Various External Influences. Meshcheryakov R; Iskhakov A; Mamchenko M; Romanova M; Uvaysov S; Amirgaliyev Y; Gromaszek K Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 35062575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Power ratio estimation in incoherent backscatter lidar: direct detection with Gaussian noise. Rye BJ Appl Opt; 1989 Sep; 28(17):3639-46. PubMed ID: 20555749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of perturbative phase noise on active coherent polarization beam combining system. Ma P; Zhou P; Wang X; Ma Y; Su R; Liu Z Opt Express; 2013 Dec; 21(24):29666-78. PubMed ID: 24514518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-mode to single-mode conversion in a 61 port Photonic Lantern. Noordegraaf D; Skovgaard PM; Maack MD; Bland-Hawthorn J; Haynes R; Laegsgaard J Opt Express; 2010 Mar; 18(5):4673-8. PubMed ID: 20389479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]