These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25836697)

  • 1. Eight years of quality control in Bulgaria: impact on mammography practice.
    Avramova-Cholakova S; Lilkov G; Kaneva M; Terziev K; Nakov I; Mutkurov N; Kovacheva D; Ivanova M; Vasilev D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):359-62. PubMed ID: 25836697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation protection and safety in medical use of ionising radiation in Republic of Bulgaria--harmonization of the national legislation with Euratom directives.
    Ingilizova K; Vassileva J; Rupova I; Pavlova A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):260-2. PubMed ID: 16461505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of QA and QC standards in radiology in Slovakia.
    Nikodemová D; Horváthová M; Salát D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):274-6. PubMed ID: 16461525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control testing of x-ray equipment used in medical diagnostic: results of interlaboratory comparison].
    Brodecki M; Bednarek A; Janiak P; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22880455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of mean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels within the all-digital Irish National Breast Screening Programme and the Irish Symptomatic Breast Services.
    O'Leary D; Rainford L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Mar; 153(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 22740646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CHALLENGES IN SETTING UP QUALITY CONTROL IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY FACILITIES IN NIGERIA.
    Inyang SO; Egbe NO; Ekpo E
    Niger J Med; 2015; 24(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 27487612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of Detector Radiation Damage on CR Mammography Quality Control].
    Moriwaki A; Ishii M; Terazono S; Arao K; Ishii R; Sanada T; Yoshida A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 May; 72(5):424-9. PubMed ID: 27211088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-line data collection platform for national dose surveys in diagnostic and interventional radiology.
    Vassileva J; Simeonov F; Avramova-Cholakova S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):121-4. PubMed ID: 25784776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IAEA support to medical physics in nuclear medicine.
    Meghzifene A; Sgouros G
    Semin Nucl Med; 2013 May; 43(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23561455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
    Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammography quality assurance from A to Z.
    Farria DM; Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; DeBruhl N
    Radiographics; 1994 Mar; 14(2):371-85. PubMed ID: 8190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PERCEPTION OF QUALITY CONTROL BY PERSONNEL IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY FACILITIES IN AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA.
    Inyang SO; Essien IE; Egbe NO
    Niger J Med; 2015; 24(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 27487613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of the state of mammography practice in Bulgaria.
    Avramova-Cholakova S; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):184-6. PubMed ID: 21831863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reference levels for image quality in mammography.
    Zdesar U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):170-2. PubMed ID: 18375465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3).
    Mora P; Blanco S; Khoury H; Leyton F; Cárdenas J; Defaz MY; Garay F; Telón F; Aguilar JG; Roas N; Gamarra M; Blanco D; Quintero AR; Nader A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24993012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
    Clarijs T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.