These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25836951)

  • 21. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
    Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modality-specific spike identification in simultaneous magnetoencephalography/electroencephalography: a methodological approach.
    Zijlmans M; Huiskamp GM; Leijten FS; Van Der Meij WM; Wieneke G; Van Huffelen AC
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 19(3):183-91. PubMed ID: 12226563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG.
    Siems M; Pape AA; Hipp JF; Siegel M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():345-355. PubMed ID: 26827813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating true brain connectivity from EEG/MEG data invariant to linear and static transformations in sensor space.
    Ewald A; Marzetti L; Zappasodi F; Meinecke FC; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2012 Mar; 60(1):476-88. PubMed ID: 22178298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetoencephalography and magnetic source imaging in epilepsy.
    Funke M; Constantino T; Van Orman C; Rodin E
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 40(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 19780348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EEG-MEG Integration Enhances the Characterization of Functional and Effective Connectivity in the Resting State Network.
    Muthuraman M; Moliadze V; Mideksa KG; Anwar AR; Stephani U; Deuschl G; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140832. PubMed ID: 26509448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of the epileptogenic tuber in patients with tuberous sclerosis: a comparison of high-resolution EEG and MEG.
    Jansen FE; Huiskamp G; van Huffelen AC; Bourez-Swart M; Boere E; Gebbink T; Vincken KL; van Nieuwenhuizen O
    Epilepsia; 2006 Jan; 47(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 16417538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.
    Lim M; Ales JM; Cottereau BR; Hastie T; Norcia AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0176835. PubMed ID: 28604790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lag-invariant detection of interactions in spatially-extended systems using linear inverse modeling.
    Hindriks R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242715. PubMed ID: 33306719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Finite Element Solution of the Forward Problem in EEG for Multipolar Sources.
    Beltrachini L
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Mar; 27(3):368-377. PubMed ID: 30561347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The sensitivity of instantaneous coherence for considering elementary comparison processing. Part II: Similarities and differences between EEG and MEG coherences.
    Schack B; Grieszbach G; Nowak H; Krause W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Mar; 31(3):241-59. PubMed ID: 10076776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency domain equivalence between potentials and currents using LORETA.
    Gomez JF; Thatcher RW
    Int J Neurosci; 2001 Apr; 107(3-4):161-71. PubMed ID: 11328689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.