119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838162)
41. [A virtual reality simulator for objective assessment of surgeons' laparoscopic skill].
Hassan I; Sitter H; Schlosser K; Zielke A; Rothmund M; Gerdes B
Chirurg; 2005 Feb; 76(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 15368058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Training to acquire psychomotor skills for endoscopic endonasal surgery using a personal webcam trainer.
Hirayama R; Fujimoto Y; Umegaki M; Kagawa N; Kinoshita M; Hashimoto N; Yoshimine T
J Neurosurg; 2013 May; 118(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23330994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Conventional box model training improves laparoscopic skills during salpingectomy on LapSim: a randomized trial.
Akdemir A; Ergenoğlu AM; Yeniel AÖ; Sendağ F
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 24592096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality.
Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA
Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator?
Sandy NS; Cruz JA; Passerotti CC; Nguyen H; Reis ST; Gouveia EM; Duarte RJ; Bruschini H; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 23849568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.
Dănilă R; Gerdes B; Ulrike H; Domínguez Fernández E; Hassan I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 19499661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Validating a standardized laparoscopy curriculum for gynecology residents: a randomized controlled trial.
Shore EM; Grantcharov TP; Husslein H; Shirreff L; Dedy NJ; McDermott CD; Lefebvre GG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):204.e1-204.e11. PubMed ID: 27131588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Use of a virtual immersion computer simulator as a model for basic training in laparoscopic urology].
Rodríguez-Covarrubias F; Martínez Liévano L; Gabilondo Pliego B; Gabilondo Navarro F; Atisha-Fregoso Y; Arroyo C
Actas Urol Esp; 2006 Sep; 30(8):819-23. PubMed ID: 17078579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Efficacy of standardized training on a virtual reality simulator to advance knee and shoulder arthroscopic motor skills.
Rahm S; Wieser K; Bauer DE; Waibel FW; Meyer DC; Gerber C; Fucentese SF
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):150. PubMed ID: 29769058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A serious game skills competition increases voluntary usage and proficiency of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator during first-year surgical residents' simulation curriculum.
El-Beheiry M; McCreery G; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 27572069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Perceptions, training experiences, and preferences of surgical residents toward laparoscopic simulation training: a resident survey.
Shetty S; Zevin B; Grantcharov TP; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 24794063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Virtual reality laparoscopic simulator as an aid in surgical resident education: two years' experience.
Kössi J; Luostarinen M
Scand J Surg; 2009; 98(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19447741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Designing a proficiency-based, content validated virtual reality curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a Delphi approach.
Palter VN; Graafland M; Schijven MP; Grantcharov TP
Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 22019340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Implementation of the laparoscopic simulator in a gynecological residency curriculum.
Kolkman W; Van de Put MA; Van den Hout WB; Trimbos JB; Jansen FW
Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1363-8. PubMed ID: 17165113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Attempted establishment of proficiency levels for laparoscopic performance on a national scale using simulation: the results from the 2004 SAGES Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) learning center study.
Van Sickle KR; Ritter EM; McClusky DA; Lederman A; Baghai M; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jan; 21(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 17111280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology.
Dauster B; Steinberg AP; Vassiliou MC; Bergman S; Stanbridge DD; Feldman LS; Fried GM
J Endourol; 2005 Jun; 19(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 15989441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Single-session baseline virtual reality simulator scores predict technical performance for laparoscopic colectomy: a study in the swine model.
Araujo SE; Seid VE; Bertoncini AB; Horcel LA; Nahas SC; Cecconello I
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 24994032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
