121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838360)
1. Scientific publishing. Hoax-detecting software spots fake papers.
Bohannon J
Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6230):18-9. PubMed ID: 25838360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review.
Dyer O
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1783. PubMed ID: 25832507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The
Wang YF; Handelsman D; Cooper TG
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(5):511. PubMed ID: 28782736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
Travis J
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Editor and the Author at Fault: A Lesson From Recent Retractions.
Talebi Bezmin Abadi A
Arch Iran Med; 2018 Aug; 21(8):376-377. PubMed ID: 30113860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Meet this super-spotter of duplicated images in science papers.
Shen H
Nature; 2020 May; 581(7807):132-136. PubMed ID: 32405024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct. Reviewer's déjà vu, French science sleuthing uncover plagiarized papers.
Balter M
Science; 2012 Mar; 335(6073):1157-8. PubMed ID: 22403360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrity in research publishing and professional accountability.
Holt GR
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2013 May; 15(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 23411572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Misconduct in medical-scientific publications].
Manschot WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jan; 139(2):98. PubMed ID: 7838231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. For the record.
Krimsky S
Nat Genet; 2002 Feb; 30(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 11818959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. Falsification charge highlights image-manipulation standards.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):356. PubMed ID: 18927360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revising the research record.
Horton R
Lancet; 1995 Dec; 346(8990):1610-1. PubMed ID: 7500757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
