121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838360)
21. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.
Service RF
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Fraud in biomedical research--the role of journal editors.
De Caterina R; Griffioen AW; Porreca F
Life Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(21-22):755-6. PubMed ID: 21983417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22299799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Publication ethics: Its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jan; 24(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22243674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Referencing retracted articles.
Emmett M
Am J Med; 2006 Jul; 119(7):e7. PubMed ID: 16828619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.
Wittau J; Seifert R
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2024 Jun; 397(6):3995-4011. PubMed ID: 37994948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
Tavare A
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Behavioral ecology. Ecologists roiled by misconduct case.
Vogel G; Proffitt F; Stone R
Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5658):606-9. PubMed ID: 14752133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Stem cell research. RIKEN panel finds misconduct in controversial paper.
Normile D
Science; 2014 Apr; 344(6179):23. PubMed ID: 24700834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Don't dodge retraction of fraudulent papers.
DeCoursey TE
Nature; 2022 Oct; 610(7930):34. PubMed ID: 36195664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Request for determination regarding papers published by Dr Yoshitaka Fujii.
Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1321. PubMed ID: 22961508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Researcher didn't get ethical approval for 68 studies, investigators say.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2011 Feb; 342():d833. PubMed ID: 21300720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Plant science. Data in key papers cannot be reproduced.
Balter M
Science; 1999 Mar; 283(5410):1987, 1989. PubMed ID: 10206895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Etiquette in scientific publishing.
Krishnan V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 24075666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism.
Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Publication ethics: its importance to readers, authors, and the profession.
Poster E; Pearson GS; Pierson C
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2012 Jan; 48(1):1. PubMed ID: 22188040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
Wylie DT
Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
