121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838360)
41. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Quality assurance in publications].
Rothmund M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Nov; 117(48):1854-8. PubMed ID: 1451652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Can we trust your data?
Moore S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Nature group journal retracts two papers after cancer researcher was found to have falsified data.
Siva N
BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d5218. PubMed ID: 21844161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7992):479-481. PubMed ID: 38087103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Iranian ministers in plagiarism row.
Butler D
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):578-9. PubMed ID: 19794465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Publication ethics.
Freeman PB
Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Japanese doctor is heading for record number of retracted research papers.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4596. PubMed ID: 22763400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Ethics in publication.
Spångberg LS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):797-8. PubMed ID: 20451839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Fabrication, falsification et Al.
Reider B
Am J Sports Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 20194952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Scientific credit and credibility.
Grant PM
Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
Youngs R; Kenyon G
J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Fraud, not error, is why two thirds of biomedical papers are withdrawn.
Roehr B
BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6658. PubMed ID: 23033379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Passion, publication, promotion and payment: which "Ps" drive scientists?
Chamon W
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2012; 75(6):383-4. PubMed ID: 23715137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Journals question integrity of almost 200 papers by Japanese anaesthetist.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2490. PubMed ID: 22474308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
