These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68. How reliable is this research? Tool flags papers discussed on PubPeer. Singh Chawla D Nature; 2024 May; 629(8011):271-272. PubMed ID: 38684831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation. Cole GD; Shun-Shin MJ; Nowbar AN; Buell KG; Al-Mayahi F; Zargaran D; Mahmood S; Singh B; Mielewczik M; Francis DP Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 44(3):862-9. PubMed ID: 26174517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The continuing problem of retracted papers. Dack S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Jan; 7(1):244-5. PubMed ID: 3510236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Papers by: Dr Aws Shakir Mustafa Salim. Forbes CD Scott Med J; 1994 Oct; 39(5):139. PubMed ID: 8778968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Peer review--loopholes, hackers and scams. Jackson A Aust Vet J; 2015; 93(1-2):N19. PubMed ID: 25789397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Former editor who fabricated data is suspended for four months. Dyer C BMJ; 2017 Sep; 358():j4537. PubMed ID: 28963122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Ernst fails to address key charges. Morley J; Rosner AL; Redwood D J Altern Complement Med; 2001 Apr; 7(2):127-8. PubMed ID: 11327517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. TL;DR: how well do machines summarize our work? Bagrow JP Nature; 2021 Feb; 590(7844):36. PubMed ID: 33531704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Editors' note regarding the notice of retraction. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1195. PubMed ID: 17074541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. The refereeing procedures for papers submitted to Clinical Radiology. Armstrong P Clin Radiol; 1992 Jul; 46(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 1643774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]