These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838801)

  • 21. The Opinion Editorial: teaching physiology outside the box.
    Poronnik P; Moni RW
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2006 Jun; 30(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 16709737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Students' satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain.
    Fernández E; García AM; Serés E; Bosch F
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e018657. PubMed ID: 29374664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and Validation of a Universal Science Writing Rubric That is Applicable to Diverse Genres of Science Writing.
    Pisano A; Crawford A; Huffman H; Graham B; Kelp N
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2021 Dec; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 34970390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Scientific Research and Writing Skills through Peer Review and Empirical Group Learning.
    Senkevitch E; Smith AC; Marbach-Ad G; Song W
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2011; 12(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 23653760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Increased Scaffolding and Inquiry in an Introductory Biology Lab Enhance Experimental Design Skills and Sense of Scientific Ability.
    Killpack TL; Fulmer SM; Roden JA; Dolce JL; Skow CD
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2020; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 32742546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Facilitating L2 writers' metacognitive strategy use in argumentative writing using a process-genre approach.
    Huang Y; Zhang LJ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1036831. PubMed ID: 36457929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A guide to writing a scientific paper: a focus on high school through graduate level student research.
    Hesselbach RA; Petering DH; Berg CA; Tomasiewicz H; Weber D
    Zebrafish; 2012 Dec; 9(4):246-9. PubMed ID: 23094692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How to incorporate and evaluate writing skills in animal science and dairy science courses.
    Haug M
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2835-42. PubMed ID: 8923198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience students write to the lay public.
    Moni RW; Hryciw DH; Poronnik P; Moni KB
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Jun; 31(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 17562906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion.
    Barry RM
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2023 Apr; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 37089232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intentionally flawed manuscripts as means for teaching students to critically evaluate scientific papers.
    Ferenc J; Červenák F; Birčák E; Juríková K; Goffová I; Gorilák P; Huraiová B; Plavá J; Demecsová L; Ďuríková N; Galisová V; Gazdarica M; Puškár M; Nagy T; Nagyová S; Mentelová L; Slaninová M; Ševčovicová A; Tomáška Ľ
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2018 Jan; 46(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 28858410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of providing peer feedback on learners' genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing.
    Wu H; Zhu H; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1059555. PubMed ID: 36533036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How baccalaureate nursing programs teach writing.
    Troxler H; Jacobson Vann JC; Oermann MH
    Nurs Forum; 2011; 46(4):280-8. PubMed ID: 22029771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing.
    Yang A; Stockwell S; McDonnell L
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2019 Sep; 47(5):589-598. PubMed ID: 31225935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incorporating Scientific Publishing into an Undergraduate Neuroscience Course: A Case Study Using IMPULSE.
    Jones LS; Allen L; Cronise K; Juneja N; Kohn R; McClellan K; Miller A; Nazir A; Patel A; Sweitzer SM; Vickery E; Walton A; Young R
    J Undergrad Neurosci Educ; 2011; 9(2):A84-91. PubMed ID: 23494013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Redesigning a Neuroscience Laboratory Course for Multiple Sections: An Action Research Project to Engage Students.
    Tu HW; Jones BD
    J Undergrad Neurosci Educ; 2017; 15(2):A137-A143. PubMed ID: 28690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Motivating and Shaping Scientific Argumentation in Lab Reports.
    Gouvea J; Appleby L; Fu L; Wagh A
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 21(4):ar71. PubMed ID: 36154118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer coaching to support writing development.
    Peinhardt RD; Hagler D
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Jan; 52(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 23181459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pleasure and pain: teaching neuroscientific principles of hedonism in a large general education undergraduate course.
    Bodnar RJ; Stellar JR; Kraft TT; Loiacono I; Bajnath A; Rotella FM; Barrientos A; Aghanori G; Olsson K; Coke T; Huang D; Luger Z; Mousavi SA; Dindyal T; Naqvi N; Kim JY
    J Undergrad Neurosci Educ; 2013; 12(1):A34-41. PubMed ID: 24319388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.