These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25838968)

  • 1. Default settings of computerized physician order entry system order sets drive ordering habits.
    Olson J; Hollenbeak C; Donaldson K; Abendroth T; Castellani W
    J Pathol Inform; 2015; 6():16. PubMed ID: 25838968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of default order set settings on telemetry ordering.
    Rubins D; Boxer R; Landman A; Wright A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1488-1492. PubMed ID: 31504592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvements in red blood cell transfusion utilization following implementation of a single-unit default for electronic ordering.
    Warner MA; Schaefer KK; Madde N; Burt JM; Higgins AA; Kor DJ
    Transfusion; 2019 Jul; 59(7):2218-2222. PubMed ID: 31002192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in Clinical Variance Using Targeted Design Changes in Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Order Sets: Impact on Hospitalized Children with Acute Asthma Exacerbation.
    Jacobs BR; Hart KW; Rucker DW
    Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 23616900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of defaults in an electronic health record on laboratory test ordering practices for pediatric patients.
    Probst CA; Shaffer VA; Chan YR
    Health Psychol; 2013 Sep; 32(9):995-1002. PubMed ID: 24001250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Better medicine by default.
    Ansher C; Ariely D; Nagler A; Rudd M; Schwartz J; Shah A
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Feb; 34(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 24125790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Order sets in computerized physician order entry systems: an analysis of seven sites.
    Wright A; Sittig DF; Carpenter JD; Krall MA; Pang JE; Middleton B
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2010 Nov; 2010():892-6. PubMed ID: 21347107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized provider order entry in the clinical laboratory.
    Baron JM; Dighe AS
    J Pathol Inform; 2011; 2():35. PubMed ID: 21886891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When order sets do not align with clinician workflow: assessing practice patterns in the electronic health record.
    Li RC; Wang JK; Sharp C; Chen JH
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Dec; 28(12):987-996. PubMed ID: 31164486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of computerized physician order entry with clinical decision support reduces practice variance in ordering preoperative investigations: A retrospective cohort study.
    Sim EY; Tan DJA; Abdullah HR
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Dec; 108():29-35. PubMed ID: 29132628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating "best of care" protocols into clinicians' workflow via care provider order entry: impact on quality-of-care indicators for acute myocardial infarction.
    Ozdas A; Speroff T; Waitman LR; Ozbolt J; Butler J; Miller RA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 16357360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction in chemotherapy order errors with computerized physician order entry.
    Meisenberg BR; Wright RR; Brady-Copertino CJ
    J Oncol Pract; 2014 Jan; 10(1):e5-9. PubMed ID: 24003174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of electronic versus written order sets in inappropriate laboratory testing among hospitalized medical patients.
    Brown I; Tran A; Soong C; Okrainec K
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Sep; 153():104546. PubMed ID: 34391017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data-driven order set generation and evaluation in the pediatric environment.
    Zhang Y; Levin JE; Padman R
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2012; 2012():1469-78. PubMed ID: 23304427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altering standard admission order sets to promote clinical laboratory stewardship: a cohort quality improvement study.
    Leis B; Frost A; Bryce R; Lyon AW; Coverett K
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2019 Oct; 28(10):846-852. PubMed ID: 31073090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Duplicate orders: an unintended consequence of computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) implementation: analysis and mitigation strategies.
    Magid S; Forrer C; Shaha S
    Appl Clin Inform; 2012; 3(4):377-91. PubMed ID: 23646085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial.
    Delvaux N; De Sutter A; Van de Velde S; Ramaekers D; Fieuws S; Aertgeerts B
    Implement Sci; 2017 Dec; 12(1):147. PubMed ID: 29212546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of peer management on test-ordering behavior.
    Neilson EG; Johnson KB; Rosenbloom ST; Dupont WD; Talbert D; Giuse DA; Kaiser A; Miller RA;
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 Aug; 141(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 15289216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of real-time clinical decision support systems for platelet and cryoprecipitate orders.
    Collins RA; Triulzi DJ; Waters JH; Reddy V; Yazer MH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jan; 141(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 24343740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors contributing to an increase in duplicate medication order errors after CPOE implementation.
    Wetterneck TB; Walker JM; Blosky MA; Cartmill RS; Hoonakker P; Johnson MA; Norfolk E; Carayon P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2011; 18(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 21803925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.