These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25839677)

  • 1. Predicting the origin of soil evidence: High throughput eukaryote sequencing and MIR spectroscopy applied to a crime scene scenario.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Breen J; Macdonald LM; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jun; 251():22-31. PubMed ID: 25839677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic soil DNA analysis using high-throughput sequencing: a comparison of four molecular markers.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():176-84. PubMed ID: 25151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: a review.
    Young JM; Rawlence NJ; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 24796953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-throughput Sequencing of Trace Quantities of Soil Provides Reproducible and Discriminative Fungal DNA Profiles.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Cooper A
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):478-484. PubMed ID: 27404621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soil DNA metabarcoding and high-throughput sequencing as a forensic tool: considerations, potential limitations and recommendations.
    Young JM; Austin JJ; Weyrich LS
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2017 Feb; 93(2):. PubMed ID: 27979996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial soil community analyses for forensic science: Application to a blind test.
    Demanèche S; Schauser L; Dawson L; Franqueville L; Simonet P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():153-158. PubMed ID: 27984802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Massively parallel sequencing is unlocking the potential of environmental trace evidence.
    Young JM; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102393. PubMed ID: 33157385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mock communities highlight the diversity of host-associated eukaryotes.
    Wegener Parfrey L
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Sep; 24(17):4337-9. PubMed ID: 26311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples.
    Young JM; Weyrich LS; Clarke LJ; Cooper A
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Jun; 11(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 25722081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Next-Generation Sequencing of the Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene for Forensic Soil Comparison: A Feasibility Study.
    Jesmok EM; Hopkins JM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 May; 61(3):607-17. PubMed ID: 27122396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soil characterisation by bacterial community analysis for forensic applications: A quantitative comparison of environmental technologies.
    Habtom H; Demanèche S; Dawson L; Azulay C; Matan O; Robe P; Gafny R; Simonet P; Jurkevitch E; Pasternak Z
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jan; 26():21-29. PubMed ID: 27750077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial DNA profiling by multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism for forensic comparison of soil and the influence of sample condition.
    Macdonald LM; Singh BK; Thomas N; Brewer MJ; Campbell CD; Dawson LA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):813-21. PubMed ID: 18429978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial Profiling of Soil For Forensic Investigations: Consideration of Ex Situ Changes in Questioned and Known Soil Samples.
    Foran DR; Badgley AJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):471-480. PubMed ID: 31584712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the link between evidence and crime scene through soil bacterial and fungal microbiome: A mock case in forensic study.
    Karadayı S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Dec; 329():111060. PubMed ID: 34736047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioinformatics Approach to Assess the Biogeographical Patterns of Soil Communities: The Utility for Soil Provenance.
    Damaso N; Mendel J; Mendoza M; von Wettberg EJ; Narasimhan G; Mills D
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1033-1042. PubMed ID: 29357400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic comparison of soils by bacterial community DNA profiling.
    Horswell J; Cordiner SJ; Maas EW; Martin TM; Sutherland KB; Speir TW; Nogales B; Osborn AM
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Mar; 47(2):350-3. PubMed ID: 11911110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial metagenome profiling using amplicon length heterogeneity-polymerase chain reaction proves more effective than elemental analysis in discriminating soil specimens.
    Moreno LI; Mills DK; Entry J; Sautter RT; Mathee K
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1315-22. PubMed ID: 17199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An improved high throughput sequencing method for studying oomycete communities.
    Sapkota R; Nicolaisen M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Mar; 110():33-9. PubMed ID: 25602160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular Identification of Soil Eukaryotes and Focused Approaches Targeting Protist and Faunal Groups Using High-Throughput Metabarcoding.
    Arjen de Groot G; Laros I; Geisen S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():125-40. PubMed ID: 26791500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.