These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2584026)
1. Beta skin dose determination using TLDs, Monte-Carlo calculations, and extrapolation chamber. Ben-Shachar B; Levine SH; Hoffman JM Health Phys; 1989 Dec; 57(6):917-25. PubMed ID: 2584026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source. Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical use of carbon-loaded thermoluminescent dosimeters for skin dose determination. Ostwald PM; Kron T; Hamilton CS; Denham JW Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):943-50. PubMed ID: 7591907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study on the response of thermoluminescent dosemeters to synchrotron radiation: experimental method and Monte Carlo calculations. Bakshi AK; Chatterjee S; Palani Selvam T; Dhabekar BS Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jul; 140(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20308052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation. Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental determination of the dose deposition profile of a 90Sr beta source. Gaza R; Bulur E; McKeever SW; Soares CG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):33-7. PubMed ID: 16644945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determination of the intrinsic energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters for 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources relative to 60Co. Reed JL; Rasmussen BE; Davis SD; Micka JA; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122103. PubMed ID: 25471976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response. Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin dose measurements using radiochromic films, TLDS and ionisation chamber and comparison with Monte Carlo simulation. Alashrah S; Kandaiya S; Maalej N; El-Taher A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Dec; 162(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 24300340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulation of angular and energy distributions of the PTB beta secondary standard. Faw RE; Simons GG; Gianakon TA; Bayouth JE Health Phys; 1990 Sep; 59(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 2394589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo simulation of depth-dose distributions in TLD-100 under 90Sr-90Y irradiation. Rodríguez-Villafuerte M; Gamboa-deBuen I; Brandan ME Health Phys; 1997 Apr; 72(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 9119682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam. Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-thin TLDs for skin dose determination in high energy photon beams. Stathakis S; Li JS; Paskalev K; Yang J; Wang L; Ma CM Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jul; 51(14):3549-67. PubMed ID: 16825748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of improved TLD dosimetry on the determination of dose rate constants for (125)I and (103)Pd brachytherapy seeds. Rodriguez M; Rogers DW Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):114301. PubMed ID: 25370677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of Monte Carlo simulations for accurate dose determination with thermoluminescence dosemeters in radiation therapy beams. Mobit P Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 101(1-4):383-6. PubMed ID: 12382773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Yao LH; Wang JJ; Shang C; Jiang P; Lin L; Sun HT; Liu L; Liu H; He D; Yang RJ Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 May; 130(9):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 28469106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of thermoluminescence dosemeters to beta radiation and skin dose assessment. Contento G; Malisan MR; Padovani R Phys Med Biol; 1984 Jun; 29(6):661-78. PubMed ID: 6463102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental and computational techniques for beta-particle dosimetry. Shen L; Catchen GL; Levine SH Health Phys; 1987 Jul; 53(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 3597097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]