176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25840299)
21. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children: outcomes at 1 year.
Astle WF; Rahmat J; Ingram AD; Huang PT
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2028-34. PubMed ID: 18053899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of Measurements and Clinical Outcomes After Wavefront-Guided LASEK Between iDesign and WaveScan.
Jung JW; Chung BH; Han SH; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2015 Jun; 31(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 26046707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized double-masked controlled trial comparing pain scores with and without the use of supplementary 2% lidocaine gel in LASIK.
Lam DS; Law RW; Ng AS; Lam PT; Jhanji V; Lee VY; Fan AH; Rao SK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 153(4):627-31, 631.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22105798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. One year follow-up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis.
Townley D; Kirwan C; O'Keefe M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20070279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of preoperative keratometry on refractive results after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopia.
de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA; Sánchez-Pina JM; Gil-Cazorla R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):968-73. PubMed ID: 18499003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical effectiveness of topical cyclosporine a 0.05% after laser epithelial keratomileusis.
Lee HS; Jang JY; Lee SH; Im SK; Yoon KC
Cornea; 2013 Jul; 32(7):e150-5. PubMed ID: 23665647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison Between Diclofenac and Ketorolac Ophthalmic Drops for Pain Management After Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Randomized Clinical Study.
Mohammadpour M; Heidari Z; Molani R
Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Mar; 45(2):137-140. PubMed ID: 29944510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1637-42. PubMed ID: 22789494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Mahmoud AM; Yoon EY; Roberts CJ; Pepose JS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1774-88. PubMed ID: 19781475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in fusional vergence amplitudes after laser refractive surgery for moderate myopia.
Han J; Hong S; Lee S; Kim JK; Lee HK; Han SH
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1670-5. PubMed ID: 25149555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes following surface ablation techniques in a large population for myopia correction.
Kulkarni SV; AlMahmoud T; Priest D; Taylor SE; Mintsioulis G; Jackson WB
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):609-19. PubMed ID: 23221080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Learning curve of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: influence on visual and refractive results.
Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Sánchez-Pina JM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1381-5. PubMed ID: 17662428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contralateral eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
He L; Manche EE
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 25321951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Koskela T; Lindén C
J Glaucoma; 2012; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual outcome and contrast sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy in low to moderate myopia: wavefront-optimized versus conventional methods.
Nassiri N; Safi S; Aghazade Amiri M; Sheibani K; Safi H; Panahi N; Nassiri N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1858-64. PubMed ID: 21852067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Flap-off epi-LASIK versus automated epithelial brush in PRK: a prospective comparison study of pain and reepithelialization times.
Magone MT; Engle AT; Easter TH; Stanley PF; Howells J; Pasternak JF
J Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 28(10):682-9. PubMed ID: 23061997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Topical ketorolac in vitreoretinal surgery: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked trial.
Kim SJ; Lo WR; Hubbard GB; Srivastava SK; Denny JP; Martin DF; Yan J; Bergstrom CS; Cribbs BE; Schwent BJ; Aaberg TM
Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 126(9):1203-8. PubMed ID: 18779478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
Chung SH; Lee IS; Lee YG; Lee HK; Kim EK; Yoon G; Seo KY
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pain, wound healing and refractive comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: results of 1 year follow-up.
Celik U; Bozkurt E; Celik B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 25081522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Cagil N; Aydin B; Ozturk S; Hasiripi H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):642-7. PubMed ID: 17397737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
