These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25840528)

  • 1. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1030-41. PubMed ID: 24216383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding of spoken language under challenging listening conditions in younger and older listeners: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Getzmann S; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1415():8-22. PubMed ID: 21880303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related neuronal responses to acoustic novelty in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users: Initial findings.
    Bönitz H; Kopp B; Büchner A; Lunner T; Lyxell B; Finke M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Jan; 129(1):133-142. PubMed ID: 29182915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Liu B; Lin Y; Gao X; Dang J
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():145-51. PubMed ID: 23673276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech.
    Martin BA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):195-213. PubMed ID: 15809545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potentials for better speech perception in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Soshi T; Hisanaga S; Kodama N; Kanekama Y; Samejima Y; Yumoto E; Sekiyama K
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():110-21. PubMed ID: 25158303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
    Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
    Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
    Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does increasing the intelligibility of a competing sound source interfere more with speech comprehension in older adults than it does in younger adults?
    Lu Z; Daneman M; Schneider BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2655-2677. PubMed ID: 27566326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.