These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25840665)

  • 1. Using electronic monitoring devices to measure inhaler adherence: a practical guide for clinicians.
    Chan AH; Harrison J; Black PN; Mitchell EA; Foster JM
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2015; 3(3):335-49.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25840665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adherence monitoring and e-health: how clinicians and researchers can use technology to promote inhaler adherence for asthma.
    Chan AH; Reddel HK; Apter A; Eakin M; Riekert K; Foster JM
    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2013; 1(5):446-54. PubMed ID: 24565615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emerging technologies for electronic monitoring of adherence, inhaler competence, and true adherence.
    Pritchard JN; Nicholls C
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2015 Apr; 28(2):69-81. PubMed ID: 25548863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the reliability of old and new features of a new electronic monitor for metered dose inhalers.
    Apter AJ; Tor M; Feldman HI
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Apr; 86(4):421-4. PubMed ID: 11345285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adherence logger for a dry powder inhaler: a new device for medical adherence research.
    Bogen D; Apter AJ
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Oct; 114(4):863-8. PubMed ID: 15480328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adherence monitoring in drug delivery.
    Denyer J
    Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2010 Oct; 7(10):1127-31. PubMed ID: 20858164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic adherence monitoring device performance and patient acceptability: a randomized control trial.
    Chan AHY; Stewart AW; Harrison J; Black PN; Mitchell EA; Foster JM
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2017 May; 14(5):401-411. PubMed ID: 28434269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient Focus and Regulatory Considerations for Inhalation Device Design: Report from the 2015 IPAC-RS/ISAM Workshop.
    Roche N; Scheuch G; Pritchard JN; Nopitsch-Mai C; Lakhani DA; Saluja B; Jamieson J; Dundon A; Wallace R; Holmes S; Cipolla D; Dolovich MB; Shah SA; Lyapustina S
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2017 Feb; 30(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 27537608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of continuity in inhaler device choice for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
    Bjermer L
    Respiration; 2014; 88(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 25195762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Could interchangeable use of dry powder inhalers affect patients?
    Price D; Summers M; Zanen P
    Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2005 Dec; (149):3-6. PubMed ID: 16279996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhalation devices and patient interface: human factors.
    Leiner S; Parkins D; Lastow O
    AAPS J; 2015 Mar; 17(2):457-61. PubMed ID: 25589457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guidelines for aerosol devices in infants, children and adults: which to choose, why and how to achieve effective aerosol therapy.
    Ari A; Fink JB
    Expert Rev Respir Med; 2011 Aug; 5(4):561-72. PubMed ID: 21859275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs)--a review of device reliability and innovation.
    Islam N; Gladki E
    Int J Pharm; 2008 Aug; 360(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 18583072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delivery of inhaled drugs for infants and small children: a commentary on present and future needs.
    Fink JB
    Clin Ther; 2012 Nov; 34(11):S36-45. PubMed ID: 23149011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhaler devices: what remains to be done?
    Smith IJ; Bell J; Bowman N; Everard M; Stein S; Weers JG
    J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv; 2010 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S25-37. PubMed ID: 21133798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospects and challenges: inhalation delivery systems.
    Niven R
    Ther Deliv; 2013 May; 4(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 23647267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What are the pros and cons of electronically monitoring inhaler use in asthma? A multistakeholder perspective.
    Howard S; Lang A; Sharples S; Shaw D
    BMJ Open Respir Res; 2016; 3(1):e000159. PubMed ID: 27933181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing the problem of noncompliance with inhalers by design: the 'patient-friendly' approach.
    Mitchell JP
    Ther Deliv; 2011 Oct; 2(10):1217-9. PubMed ID: 22826877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability and patient acceptability of the SmartTrack device: a new electronic monitor and reminder device for metered dose inhalers.
    Foster JM; Smith L; Usherwood T; Sawyer SM; Rand CS; Reddel HK
    J Asthma; 2012 Aug; 49(6):657-62. PubMed ID: 22741746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of electronic monitoring devices to measure antiretroviral adherence: practical considerations.
    Bova CA; Fennie KP; Knafl GJ; Dieckhaus KD; Watrous E; Williams AB
    AIDS Behav; 2005 Mar; 9(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 15812617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.