272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25841195)
1. Cattle-derived microbial input to source water catchments: An experimental assessment of stream crossing modification.
Smolders A; Rolls RJ; Ryder D; Watkinson A; Mackenzie M
J Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 156():143-9. PubMed ID: 25841195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Faecal indicator organism inputs to watercourses from streamside pastures grazed by cattle: Before and after implementation of streambank fencing.
Kay D; Crowther J; Stapleton CM; Wyer MD
Water Res; 2018 Oct; 143():229-239. PubMed ID: 29960177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integrated analysis of water quality parameters for cost-effective faecal pollution management in river catchments.
Nnane DE; Ebdon JE; Taylor HD
Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2235-46. PubMed ID: 21324505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Escherichia coli and enterococci are sensitive and reliable indicators for human, livestock and wildlife faecal pollution in alpine mountainous water resources.
Farnleitner AH; Ryzinska-Paier G; Reischer GH; Burtscher MM; Knetsch S; Kirschner AK; Dirnböck T; Kuschnig G; Mach RL; Sommer R
J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Nov; 109(5):1599-608. PubMed ID: 20629798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Faecal indicator pollution from a dairy farm in Ayrshire, Scotland: source apportionment, risk assessment and potential of mitigation measures.
Vinten AJ; Sym G; Avdic K; Crawford C; Duncan A; Merrilees DW
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(4-5):997-1012. PubMed ID: 18001813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting microbial pollution concentrations in UK rivers in response to land use change.
Hampson D; Crowther J; Bateman I; Kay D; Posen P; Stapleton C; Wyer M; Fezzi C; Jones P; Tzanopoulos J
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4748-59. PubMed ID: 20708770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial water pollution: a screening tool for initial catchment-scale assessment and source apportionment.
Kay D; Anthony S; Crowther J; Chambers BJ; Nicholson FA; Chadwick D; Stapleton CM; Wyer MD
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Nov; 408(23):5649-56. PubMed ID: 19717181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream.
Sunohara MD; Topp E; Wilkes G; Gottschall N; Neumann N; Ruecker N; Jones TH; Edge TA; Marti R; Lapen DR
J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(4):1301-14. PubMed ID: 22751075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prioritisation of farm scale remediation efforts for reducing losses of nutrients and faecal indicator organisms to waterways: a case study of New Zealand dairy farming.
Monaghan RM; de Klein CA; Muirhead RW
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):609-22. PubMed ID: 18164122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model framework to assess the effect of dairy farms and wild fowl on microbial water quality during base-flow conditions.
Muirhead RW; Elliott AH; Monaghan RM
Water Res; 2011 Apr; 45(9):2863-74. PubMed ID: 21453952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative catchment profiling to apportion faecal indicator organism budgets for the Ribble system, the UK's sentinel drainage basin for Water Framework Directive research.
Stapleton CM; Wyer MD; Crowther J; McDonald AT; Kay D; Greaves J; Wither A; Watkins J; Francis C; Humphrey N; Bradford M
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):535-50. PubMed ID: 18082929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification and management of microbial contaminations in a surface drinking water source.
Aström J; Pettersson TJ; Stenström TA
J Water Health; 2007; 5 Suppl 1():67-79. PubMed ID: 17890837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution.
Fujioka RS
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):181-8. PubMed ID: 11724486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stormflow-dominated loads of faecal pollution from an intensively dairy-farmed catchment.
Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Lydiard E
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1519-23. PubMed ID: 18520007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Farmyards, an overlooked source for highly contaminated runoff.
Edwards AC; Kay D; McDonald AT; Francis C; Watkins J; Wilkinson JR; Wyer MD
J Environ Manage; 2008 Jun; 87(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18179860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Faecal-indicator concentrations in waters draining lowland pastoral catchments in the UK: relationships with land use and farming practices.
Crowther J; Kay D; Wyer MD
Water Res; 2002 Apr; 36(7):1725-34. PubMed ID: 12044072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Water quality effects of herded stream crossings by domestic sheep bands.
Clark PE; Moffet CA; Lewis GS; Seyfried MS; Hardegree SP; Pierson FB
J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(5):1580-90. PubMed ID: 23099950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A two reservoir model to predict Escherichia coli losses to water from pastures grazed by dairy cows.
Muirhead RW; Monaghan RM
Environ Int; 2012 Apr; 40():8-14. PubMed ID: 22280922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential behaviour of Escherichia coli and Campylobacter spp. in a stream draining dairy pasture.
Stott R; Davies-Colley R; Nagels J; Donnison A; Ross C; Muirhead R
J Water Health; 2011 Mar; 9(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21301115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
