289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25841562)
1. Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.
Reed WR; Long CR; Kawchuk GN; Pickar JG
Man Ther; 2015 Dec; 20(6):797-804. PubMed ID: 25841562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural Responses to Physical Characteristics of a High-velocity, Low-amplitude Spinal Manipulation: Effect of Thrust Direction.
Reed WR; Long CR; Kawchuk GN; Sozio RS; Pickar JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jan; 43(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 26863348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.
Reed WR; Pickar JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):E752-9. PubMed ID: 25856263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.
Reed WR; Long CR; Kawchuk GN; Pickar JG
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014 Feb; 37(2):68-78. PubMed ID: 24387888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of lumbar paraspinal muscles spindles is greater to spinal manipulative loading compared with slower loading under length control.
Pickar JG; Sung PS; Kang YM; Ge W
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 17905321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.
Cao DY; Reed WR; Long CR; Kawchuk GN; Pickar JG
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Feb; 36(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 23499141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paraspinal muscle spindle responses to the duration of a spinal manipulation under force control.
Pickar JG; Kang YM
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Jan; 29(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16396726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Thrust Magnitude and Duration on Immediate Postspinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Responses.
Lima CR; Sozio RS; Law AC; Nelson AJ; Singh H; Hurt CP; Li P; Reed WR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Jun; 44(5):363-371. PubMed ID: 34103172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of unilateral facet fixation and facetectomy on muscle spindle responsiveness during simulated spinal manipulation in an animal model.
Reed WR; Long CR; Pickar JG
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013; 36(9):585-94. PubMed ID: 24161386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of spinal manipulation duration on low threshold mechanoreceptors in lumbar paraspinal muscles: a preliminary report.
Sung PS; Kang YM; Pickar JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 15626991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response of muscle proprioceptors to spinal manipulative-like loads in the anesthetized cat.
Pickar JG; Wheeler JD
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jan; 24(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 11174689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.
Reed WR; Pickar JG; Sozio RS; Liebschner MAK; Little JW; Gudavalli MR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017; 40(6):371-380. PubMed ID: 28633885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level on Immediate Post-Spinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Response in an Animal Model.
Lima CR; Martins DF; Avatapally S; Cho M; Li P; Reed WR
Brain Sci; 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34439641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the cat as a model for the human lumbar spine during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation.
Ianuzzi A; Pickar JG; Khalsa PS
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Jul; 132(7):071008. PubMed ID: 20590286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.
Edgecombe TL; Kawchuk GN; Long CR; Pickar JG
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24139864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulation of chemosensitive afferents from multifidus muscle does not sensitize multifidus muscle spindles to vertebral loads in the lumbar spine of the cat.
Kang YM; Wheeler JD; Pickar JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1528-36. PubMed ID: 11462081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time course for the development of muscle history in lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles arising from changes in vertebral position.
Ge W; Pickar JG
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):320-8. PubMed ID: 17938002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of spinal manipulation on the development of history-dependent responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.
Cao DY; Pickar JG
J Can Chiropr Assoc; 2014 Jun; 58(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 24932019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of sampling rates on the quantification of forces, durations, and rates of loading of simulated side posture high-velocity, low-amplitude lumbar spine manipulation.
Gudavalli MR; DeVocht J; Tayh A; Xia T
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Jun; 36(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 23790603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vivo preparation for investigating neural responses to controlled loading of a lumbar vertebra in the anesthetized cat.
Pickar JG
J Neurosci Methods; 1999 Jul; 89(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 10491938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
