These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25841617)

  • 1. Memory boosts turn taking in evolutionary dilemma games.
    Wang T; Chen Z; Yang L; Zou Y; Luo J
    Biosystems; 2015 May; 131():30-9. PubMed ID: 25841617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reciprocity phase in various 2×2 games by agents equipped with two-memory length strategy encouraged by grouping for interaction and adaptation.
    Wakiyama M; Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 21035518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study on emergence of alternating reciprocity in a 2 x 2 game with 2-length memory strategy.
    Tanimoto J; Sagara H
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(3):728-37. PubMed ID: 17418483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.
    Xu Z; Le Y; Zhang L
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Apr; 89(4):042142. PubMed ID: 24827227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cheating is evolutionarily assimilated with cooperation in the continuous snowdrift game.
    Sasaki T; Okada I
    Biosystems; 2015 May; 131():51-9. PubMed ID: 25868940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game.
    Hauert C; Doebeli M
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):643-6. PubMed ID: 15074318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation.
    Sicardi EA; Fort H; Vainstein MH; Arenzon JJ
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 18952109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opportunistic migration in spatial evolutionary games.
    Buesser P; Tomassini M; Antonioni A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Oct; 88(4):042806. PubMed ID: 24229225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential interactions-in which one player plays first and another responds-promote cooperation in evolutionary-dynamical simulations of single-shot Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift games.
    Laird RA
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Sep; 452():69-80. PubMed ID: 29763610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas.
    Nakamura M; Ohtsuki H
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Aug; 355():117-27. PubMed ID: 24721479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of network reciprocity in Prisoner's Dilemma games using Full Factorial Designs of Experiment.
    Yamauchi A; Tanimoto J; Hagishima A
    Biosystems; 2011 Jan; 103(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20955762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct reciprocity in spatial populations enhances R-reciprocity as well as ST-reciprocity.
    Miyaji K; Tanimoto J; Wang Z; Hagishima A; Ikegaya N
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71961. PubMed ID: 23951272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The promotion of cooperation by the poor in dynamic chicken games.
    Ito H; Katsumata Y; Hasegawa E; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43377. PubMed ID: 28233837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple scaling of the effectiveness of supporting mutual cooperation in donor-recipient games by various reciprocity mechanisms.
    Tanimoto J
    Biosystems; 2009 Apr; 96(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19059458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference of reciprocity effect in two coevolutionary models of presumed two-player and multiplayer games.
    Tanimoto J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Jun; 87(6):062136. PubMed ID: 23848656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.
    Gianetto DA; Heydari B
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():21870. PubMed ID: 26899456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chaos, oscillation and the evolution of indirect reciprocity in n-person games.
    Suzuki S; Akiyama E
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Jun; 252(4):686-93. PubMed ID: 18371983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cooperative responses in rats playing a 2 × 2 game: Effects of opponent strategy, payoff, and oxytocin.
    Donovan A; Ryan E; Wood RI
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Nov; 121():104803. PubMed ID: 32755813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dilemma solving by the coevolution of networks and strategy in a 2 x 2 game.
    Tanimoto J
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Aug; 76(2 Pt 1):021126. PubMed ID: 17930025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.
    McNamara JM; Barta Z; Houston AI
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):745-8. PubMed ID: 15085131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.