166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25842126)
21. Role of phase separation on the biological performance of 45S5 Bioglass
Kowal TJ; Golovchak R; Chokshi T; Harms J; Thamma U; Jain H; Falk MM
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 Sep; 28(10):161. PubMed ID: 28905286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bioglass® 45S5-based composites for bone tissue engineering and functional applications.
Rizwan M; Hamdi M; Basirun WJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Nov; 105(11):3197-3223. PubMed ID: 28686004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative study of the effects of different bioactive fillers in PLGA matrix composites and their suitability as bone substitute materials: A thermo-mechanical and in vitro investigation.
Simpson RL; Nazhat SN; Blaker JJ; Bismarck A; Hill R; Boccaccini AR; Hansen UN; Amis AA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Oct; 50():277-89. PubMed ID: 26164218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. SBF assays, direct and indirect cell culture tests to evaluate the biological performance of bioglasses and bioglass-based composites: Three paradigmatic cases.
Bellucci D; Salvatori R; Anesi A; Chiarini L; Cannillo V
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Mar; 96():757-764. PubMed ID: 30606588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics versus hydroxyapatite: Comparison of angiogenic potential and biological responsiveness.
Bellucci D; Braccini S; Chiellini F; Balasubramanian P; Boccaccini AR; Cannillo V
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2019 Dec; 107(12):2601-2609. PubMed ID: 31376313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mg- and/or Sr-doped tricalcium phosphate/bioactive glass composites: synthesis, microstructure and biological responsiveness.
Bellucci D; Sola A; Cacciotti I; Bartoli C; Gazzarri M; Bianco A; Chiellini F; Cannillo V
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Sep; 42():312-24. PubMed ID: 25063124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A quantitative study of the sintering and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite/phosphate glass composites.
Tancred DC; McCormack BA; Carr AJ
Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1735-43. PubMed ID: 9856584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A new model formulation of the SiO2-Al2O3-B2O3-MgO-CaO-Na2O-F glass-ceramics.
Agathopoulos S; Tulyaganov DU; Valério P; Ferreira JM
Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2255-64. PubMed ID: 15585227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of fluoride additions on biological and mechanical properties of Na2O-CaO-SiO2-P2O5 glass-ceramics.
Li HC; Wang DG; Hu JH; Chen CZ
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():171-8. PubMed ID: 24411365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating morphology and mechanical properties of glass-reinforced natural hydroxyapatite composites.
Yazdanpanah Z; Bahrololoom ME; Hashemi B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Jan; 41():36-42. PubMed ID: 25460401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Case study: Reinforcement of 45S5 bioglass robocast scaffolds by HA/PCL nanocomposite coatings.
Motealleh A; Eqtesadi S; Pajares A; Miranda P; Salamon D; Castkova K
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():114-118. PubMed ID: 28709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of ZrO(2) additions on the crystallization, mechanical and biological properties of MgO-CaO-SiO(2)-P(2)O(5)-CaF(2) bioactive glass-ceramics.
Li HC; Wang DG; Meng XG; Chen CZ
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2014 Jun; 118():226-33. PubMed ID: 24780435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vitro biocompatibility of Ti-45S5 bioglass nanocomposites and their scaffolds.
Kaczmarek M; Jurczyk MU; Rubis B; Banaszak A; Kolecka A; Paszel A; Jurczyk K; Murias M; Sikora J; Jurczyk M
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2014 May; 102(5):1316-24. PubMed ID: 23720374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnetic 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: bioactive glass (45S5) coated with iron-loaded hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.
Dittler ML; Zelís PM; Beltrán AM; Destch R; Grillo CA; Gonzalez MC; Boccaccini AR
Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 34265757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel porous hydroxyapatite prepared by combining H2O2 foaming with PU sponge and modified with PLGA and bioactive glass.
Huang X; Miao X
J Biomater Appl; 2007 Apr; 21(4):351-74. PubMed ID: 16543281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multi-layer porous fiber-reinforced composites for implants: in vitro calcium phosphate formation in the presence of bioactive glass.
Nganga S; Zhang D; Moritz N; Vallittu PK; Hupa L
Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1134-45. PubMed ID: 22925703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the hydroxyapatite-bioactive glass and fluorapatite-bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as tissue scaffold for bone repair.
Seyedmajidi S; Seyedmajidi M; Zabihi E; Hajian-Tilaki K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Oct; 106(10):2605-2612. PubMed ID: 29896905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Research development of hydroxyapatite-based composites used as hard tissue replacement].
Ning C; Dai K
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Sep; 20(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 14565037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Near net-shape fabrication of hydroxyapatite glass composites.
Zhu Q; De With G; Dortmans LJ; Feenstra F
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1187-91. PubMed ID: 15880926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Densification, phase stability and in vitro biocompatibility property of hydroxyapatite-10 wt% silver composites.
Nath S; Kalmodia S; Basu B
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2010 Apr; 21(4):1273-87. PubMed ID: 19967432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
