BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25842466)

  • 21. Fracture load of monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns and veneered zirconia crowns as a posterior implant restoration.
    Kim JH; Lee SJ; Park JS; Ryu JJ
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 23296031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A randomized trial on the aesthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations with zirconia or titanium abutments.
    Carrillo de Albornoz A; Vignoletti F; Ferrantino L; Cárdenas E; De Sanctis M; Sanz M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Dec; 41(12):1161-9. PubMed ID: 25244317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1304-1306. PubMed ID: 25040237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
    Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.
    Ekfeldt A; Fürst B; Carlsson GE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 21382085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrievability of implant-supported zirconia restorations cemented on zirconia abutments.
    Lennartz A; Dohmen A; Bishti S; Fischer H; Wolfart S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):740-746. PubMed ID: 29807736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survey of United States dental schools on cementation protocols for implant crown restorations.
    Tarica DY; Alvarado VM; Truong ST
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):68-79. PubMed ID: 20141811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns.
    Ellakwa A; Raj T; Deeb S; Ronaghi G; Martin FE; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microstructure of titanium-cement-lithium disilicate interface in CAD-CAM dental implant crowns: a three-dimensional profilometric analysis.
    Cresti S; Itri A; Rebaudi A; Diaspro A; Salerno M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1():e97-e106. PubMed ID: 23968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CAD/CAM implant abutments using coded healing abutments: a detailed description of the restorative process.
    Mahn DH; Prestipino T
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):612-5. PubMed ID: 24564614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving darkened anterior peri-implant tissue color with zirconia custom implant abutments.
    Watkin A; Kerstein RB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 May; 29(4):238-40, 242. PubMed ID: 18524208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simplified fabrication of an implant-supported framework with luted abutment cylinders.
    Stumpel LJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 28024820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abutment design for implant-supported indirect composite molar crowns: reliability and fractography.
    Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Lubelski W; Thompson VP; de Carvalho RM; Witek L; Coelho PG
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):596-603. PubMed ID: 22672650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An esthetics rehabilitation with computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing technology.
    Mazaro JV; de Mello CC; Zavanelli AC; Santiago JF; Amoroso AP; Pellizzer EP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jul; 15(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25576121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
    Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial.
    Joda T; Brägger U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1047-53. PubMed ID: 26394340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations.
    Magne P; Silva M; Oderich E; Boff LL; Enciso R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 22092518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.