These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25842466)

  • 41. Predictable tissue integration and natural aesthetics using a zirconia CAD/CAM abutment and crowns.
    Margeas R; Humphrey R
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007; 19(10):615-9. PubMed ID: 18246994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Edentulous arch treatment with a CAD/CAM screw-retained framework and cemented crowns: a clinical case report.
    Baig MR; Rajan G; Rajan M
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20017646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fabrication of the mandibular implant-supported fixed restoration using CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report.
    Reshad M; Cascione D; Aalam AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 19853167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of digital data acquisition and CAD/CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 24189115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
    Wasiluk G; Chomik E; Gehrke P; Pietruska M; Skurska A; Pietruski J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. CAD/CAM-fabricated template for locating implant abutment screws in cement-retained anatomic zirconia restorations.
    Lee DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 26013067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simplified Fabrication of an Esthetic Implant-Supported Crown With a Novel CAD/CAM Glass Ceramic.
    Conejo J; Blatz MB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2016 Jun; 37(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 27517477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
    Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
    Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study.
    Benic GI; Gallucci GO; Mokti M; Hämmerle CH; Weber HP; Jung RE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Nov; 40(11):1052-61. PubMed ID: 24015975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A technique to eliminate subgingival cement adhesion to implant abutments by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape.
    Hess TA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 24529837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digitally enhanced dentistry: the power of digital design.
    Guichet D
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Mar; 43(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 25864301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use of CAD/CAM to fabricate duplicate abutments for retrofitting an existing implant prosthesis: a clinical report.
    Kim C; Kim JY; Lim YJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 24725613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Place and restore dental implants economically.
    Patel PB
    Dent Today; 2012 Oct; 31(10):116, 118. PubMed ID: 23156638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.