BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25843447)

  • 21. Stem length in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does it make a difference in bone remodeling?
    Samy AM; El-Tantawy A
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Aug; 29(6):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 30989339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Periprosthetic mineral density in cement-free hip replacement arthroplasty].
    Reiter A; Sabo D; Simank HG; Büchner T; Seidel M; Lukoschek M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(6):499-504. PubMed ID: 9499515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Bone Remodelling in the Proximal Femur after Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoporosis].
    Lacko M; Schreierová D; Čellár R; Vaško G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2015; 82(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 26787184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative measurements of adaptive bone remodeling around the cemented Zimmer® segmental stem after tumor resection arthroplasty using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Enciso Holm C; Horstmann P; Sørensen MS; Dyreborg K; Petersen MM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun; 22(1):518. PubMed ID: 34090413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No medium-term advantage of electrochemical deposition of hydroxyapatite in cementless femoral stems. 5-year RSA and DXA results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Flatøy B; Röhrl SM; Bøe B; Nordsletten L
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Feb; 87(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 26364953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
    Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bone remodelling after femoral short stem implantation in total hip arthroplasty: 1-year results from a randomized DEXA study.
    Freitag T; Hein MA; Wernerus D; Reichel H; Bieger R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Jan; 136(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 26613788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Monitoring of periprosthetic BMD after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry--a 3-year follow-up study.
    Venesmaa PK; Kröger HP; Miettinen HJ; Jurvelin JS; Suomalainen OT; Alhava EM
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Jun; 16(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 11393782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA.
    Sabo D; Reiter A; Simank HG; Thomsen M; Lukoschek M; Ewerbeck V
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 Feb; 62(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9437053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry.
    Grant P; Aamodt A; Falch JA; Nordsletten L
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1280-5. PubMed ID: 15925474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increased migration of uncemented acetabular cups in female total hip arthroplasty patients with low systemic bone mineral density. A 2-year RSA and 8-year radiographic follow-up study of 34 patients.
    Finnilä S; Moritz N; SvedströM E; Alm JJ; Aro HT
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Feb; 87(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 26569616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bone loss after total hip arthroplasty.
    Dan D; Germann D; Burki H; Hausner P; Kappeler U; Meyer RP; Klaghofer R; Stoll T
    Rheumatol Int; 2006 Jul; 26(9):792-8. PubMed ID: 16763871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Ultra-Short Femoral Neck-Preserving Hip Prosthesis: A 2-Year Follow-up Study with Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Stepwise Introduction.
    Christiansen JD; Ejaz A; Nielsen PT; Laursen M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jan; 102(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31596796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mid-term gender-specific differences in periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of a curved bone-preserving hip stem.
    Meyer JS; Freitag T; Reichel H; Bieger R
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1495-1500. PubMed ID: 33132094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparative periprosthetic bone density measurements of the proximal femur shaft using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) with experimental "Press Fit-gliding Stem Prosthesis"].
    Krüger A; Berli B; Lampert C; Kränzlin C; Morscher E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 9615973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.
    Sessa G; Costarella L; Puma Pagliarello C; Di Stefano A; Sessa A; Testa G; Pavone V
    Int Orthop; 2019 Jan; 43(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 30284002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decreased femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density: a comparative study using DXA in patients after cementless total hip arthroplasty with osteonecrosis of the femoral head versus primary osteoarthritis.
    Craiovan B; Woerner M; Winkler S; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Keshmiri A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 26891850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the Effects of the Metha® Short Stem on Periprosthetic Bone Remodelling in Total Hip Arthroplasties: Results at 48 Months.
    Parchi PD; Ciapini G; Castellini I; Mannucci C; Nucci AM; Piolanti N; Maffei S; Lisanti M
    Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul; 30():346-351. PubMed ID: 28277592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An evaluation of proximal femur bone density in young, active patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at one year postoperatively.
    Nam D; Salih R; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    Hip Int; 2019 Jan; 29(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29726298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of early femoral bone remodeling and functional outcome after total hip arthroplasty using the SL-PLUS MIA stem with and without hydroxyapatite coating.
    Tanaka A; Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Dec; 104(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 31549343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.