These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1011 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25843614)
41. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Hollander T; Early DS; Wang JS Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 22381531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence. Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Impact of sedation type on adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy. Tarhini H; Alrazim A; Ghusn W; Hosni M; Kerbage A; Soweid A; Sharara AI; Mourad F; Francis F; Shaib Y; Barada K; Daniel F Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2022; 46(7):101981. PubMed ID: 35728761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore. Koh FH; Ladlad J; ; Teo EK; Lin CL; Foo FJ Surg Endosc; 2023 Jan; 37(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 35882667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Usefulness of polyp and adenoma detection rate in the proximal and distal colon]. Choi SY; Park DI; Lee CK; Cha JM; Lee SH; Whangbo Y; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jan; 63(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24463283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Screening Colonoscopy Withdrawal Time Threshold for Adequate Proximal Serrated Polyp Detection Rate. Patel VD; Thompson WK; Lapin BR; Goldstein JL; Yen EF Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3084-3090. PubMed ID: 29974376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Polyp detection rate may predict adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis. Niv Y Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 30(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 29293111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Detection rates for adenomas, serrated polyps and clinically relevant serrated polyps can be easily estimated by individually calculated detection rate ratios. Buerger M; Kasper P; Scheller I; Hofer JH; Toermer H; Stelzer A; Stenschke F; Stollenwerk M; Allo G; Goeser T; Steffen HM; Schramm C Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):745-751. PubMed ID: 32524866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Impact of fair bowel preparation quality on adenoma and serrated polyp detection: data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry by using a standardized preparation-quality rating. Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Robinson CM; Goodrich M; Weiss JE Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Sep; 80(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 24818550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial. Biecker E; Floer M; Heinecke A; Ströbel P; Böhme R; Schepke M; Meister T J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015; 49(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24921209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Williams JE; Le TD; Faigel DO Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 20970795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study. Gralnek IM; Suissa A; Domanov S Endoscopy; 2014 Oct; 46(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 25225962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?]. Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy. Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks. Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison of Linked Color Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Adenoma Requiring Endoscopic Treatment: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. Tanaka S; Omori J; Hoshimoto A; Nishimoto T; Akimoto N; Tatsuguchi A; Fujimori S; Iwakiri K J Nippon Med Sch; 2023; 90(1):111-120. PubMed ID: 36908124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Effect of successive endoscopic procedures in polyp and adenoma detection rates: Too early is not always too good. Olivera P; Cernadas G; Fanjul I; Peralta D; Zubiaurre I; Lasa J; Moore R Indian J Gastroenterol; 2020 Oct; 39(5):450-456. PubMed ID: 33150568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]