These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25844517)

  • 1. Interviewing strategically to elicit admissions from guilty suspects.
    Tekin S; Granhag PA; Strömwall L; Giolla EM; Vrij A; Hartwig M
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 25844517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interviewing Suspects in Denial: On How Different Evidence Disclosure Modes Affect the Elicitation of New Critical Information.
    May L; Granhag PA; Tekin S
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1154. PubMed ID: 28769829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advancing the Shift-of-Strategy approach: Shifting suspects' strategies in extended interviews.
    Nyström L; Luke TJ; Granhag PA; Dönmez AK; Ekelund M; Stern PD
    Law Hum Behav; 2024 Feb; 48(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 38573704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Police reports of mock suspect interrogations: A test of accuracy and perception.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):230-243. PubMed ID: 27936825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Police interviewing and interrogation: a self-report survey of police practices and beliefs.
    Kassin SM; Leo RA; Meissner CA; Richman KD; Colwell LH; Leach AM; La Fon D
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):381-400. PubMed ID: 17253153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting cues to false intent: a new application of strategic interviewing.
    Clemens F; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):512-22. PubMed ID: 21170575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interrogation decision-making model: A general theoretical framework for confessions.
    Yang Y; Guyll M; Madon S
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 27762573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.
    Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.
    Normile CJ; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 30284849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 23876091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facts only the perpetrator could have known? A study of contamination in mock crime interrogations.
    Alceste F; Jones KA; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):128-142. PubMed ID: 32162950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The world is not fair: an examination of innocent and guilty suspects' waiver decisions.
    Scherr KC; Franks AS
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 25602182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Police suspect interviews with autistic adults: The impact of truth telling versus deception on testimony.
    Bagnall R; Cadman A; Russell A; Brosnan M; Otte M; Maras KL
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1117415. PubMed ID: 37034927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does video recording inhibit crime suspects? Evidence from a fully randomized field experiment.
    Kassin SM; Russano MB; Amrom AD; Hellgren J; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 30762416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innocence and resisting confession during interrogation: effects on physiologic activity.
    Guyll M; Madon S; Yang Y; Lannin DG; Scherr K; Greathouse S
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Oct; 37(5):366-75. PubMed ID: 23914920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why suspects confess: The power of outcome certainty.
    Yang Y; Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Madon S
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):468-476. PubMed ID: 31524435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-sighted confession decisions: the role of uncertain and delayed consequences.
    Yang Y; Madon S; Guyll M
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 25133917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?
    Kassin SM
    Am Psychol; 2005 Apr; 60(3):215-28. PubMed ID: 15796676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biphasic process of resistance among suspects: The mobilization and decline of self-regulatory resources.
    Madon S; Guyll M; Yang Y; Smalarz L; Marschall J; Lannin DG
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):159-172. PubMed ID: 27762570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "It wasn't me, check the cameras!" Suspects' apparent verifiable responses might not indicate innocence.
    Jiménez-González AI; Masip J; Blandón-Gitlin I; Herrero C
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(6):504-525. PubMed ID: 38032248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.