These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25844562)

  • 1. The Americleft Project: A Proposed Expanded Nasolabial Appearance Yardstick for 5- to 7-Year-Old Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (CUCLP).
    Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Semb G; Ozawa T; Smith A; Lin AY; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 Jan; 53(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 25844562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Americleft Project: A Modification of Asher-McDade Method for Rating Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Using Q-sort.
    Stoutland A; Long RE; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway RR; Russell KA; Singer E; Semb G; Shaw WC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 28906328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of Americleft Yardstick Nasolabial Appearance Assessment With/Without Basal View for Japanese Children With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Amir MS; Fuchigami T; Kibe T; Tezuka M; Ishihata K; Nakamura N
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Aug; 56(7):953-959. PubMed ID: 30602307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Americleft Project: Comparison of Ratings Using Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Images for Evaluation of Nasolabial Appearance in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Jones CM; Roth B; Mercado AM; Russell KA; Daskalogiannakis J; Samson TD; Hathaway RR; Smith A; Mackay DR; Long RE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):105-108. PubMed ID: 29286995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Burden of Care of Various Infant Orthopedic Protocols for Improvement of Nasolabial Esthetics in Patients With CUCLP.
    Singer E; Daskalogiannakis J; Russell KA; Mercado AM; Hathaway RR; Stoutland A; Long RE; Fessler J; Semb G; Shaw WC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Oct; 55(9):1236-1243. PubMed ID: 29624437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nasolabial aesthetics correlates poorly with skeletal symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Urbanova W; Brudnicki A; Strydom H; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jan; 66(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 22985870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index in Comparison With Two Scoring Systems in Nonsyndromic Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB; Don Griot JP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1242-5. PubMed ID: 26080166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.
    Mercado A; Russell K; Hathaway R; Daskalogiannakis J; Sadek H; Long RE; Cohen M; Semb G; Shaw W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21219227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nasolabial symmetry and aesthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Fudalej P; Katsaros C; Hozyasz K; Borstlap WA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 50(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 22245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Intercenter Comparison of Nasolabial Appearance Including a Center Using Nasoalveolar Molding.
    Peanchitlertkajorn S; Mercado A; Daskalogiannakis J; Hathaway R; Russell K; Semb G; Shaw W; Lamichane M; Cohen M; Long RE
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):655-663. PubMed ID: 29446986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference photographs for nasolabial appearance rating in unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Nollet PJ; Semb G; Bronkhorst EM; Shaw WC; Katsaros C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1683-6. PubMed ID: 19816333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nasolabial Aesthetics Following Cleft Repair: An Objective Evaluation of Subjective Assessment.
    Kantar RS; Maliha SG; Alfonso AR; Wang MM; Ramly EP; Eisemann BS; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; Flores RL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2019 Oct; 56(9):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 31117813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.
    Mosmuller DGM; Mennes LM; Prahl C; Kramer GJC; Disse MA; van Couwelaar GM; Niessen FB; Griot JPWD
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Sep; 54(5):555-561. PubMed ID: 27537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Active Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Intercenter Outcome Comparison of Latham, Modified McNeil, and Nasoalveolar Molding.
    Kornbluth M; Campbell RE; Daskalogiannakis J; Ross EJ; Glick PH; Russell KA; Doucet JC; Hathaway RR; Long RE; Sitzman TJ
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 May; 55(5):639-648. PubMed ID: 29461877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgment of Nasolabial Esthetics in Cleft Lip and Palate Is Not Influenced by Overall Facial Attractiveness.
    Kocher K; Kowalski P; Kolokitha OE; Katsaros C; Fudalej PS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2016 May; 53(3):e45-52. PubMed ID: 25932752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment.
    Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Mouës CM; Breugem CC; van der Molen ABM; Don Griot JPW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):1006-1012. PubMed ID: 27996297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial appearance of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by professional, patient and layperson using 2 aesthetic scoring systems: A cross sectional study.
    Duggal I; Talwar A; Duggal R; Chaudhari PK; Samrit V
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):660-666. PubMed ID: 37061872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 5. General discussion and conclusions.
    Russell K; Long RE; Hathaway R; Daskalogiannakis J; Mercado A; Cohen M; Semb G; Shaw W
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 May; 48(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 21219225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Don Griot JP; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1222-5. PubMed ID: 24978682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Russell KA; Orthod D; Tompson B; Orthod D; Paedo D
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 May; 46(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19642746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.