These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25844995)

  • 21. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.
    Zhai S; Zhao W; Zhu B; Huang X; Liang C; Hai B; Ding L; Zhu H; Wang X; Wei F; Chu H; Liu X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 May; 23(1):502. PubMed ID: 35624443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patients' experience with nonsurgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a qualitative study.
    Bove AM; Lynch AD; Ammendolia C; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 28870836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Differences in clinical outcomes and health care utilization between octogenarians and nonagenarians following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. A market scan analysis.
    Sharma M; Dietz N; Ugiliweneza B; Wang D; Drazin D; Boakye M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 182():63-69. PubMed ID: 31082620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Indirect effects of decompression surgery on glycemic homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee KW; Cho HG; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24983668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
    Moojen WA; Arts MP; Jacobs WC; van Zwet EW; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Koes BW; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2295-305. PubMed ID: 25586759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Influence of Pre- and Postoperative Fear Avoidance Beliefs on Postoperative Pain and Disability in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) Data.
    Burgstaller JM; Wertli MM; Steurer J; Kessels AGH; Held U; Gramke HF;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(7):E425-E432. PubMed ID: 27509192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Nakagawa M; Ishimoto Y; Nagata K; Fukui D; Sumiya T; Kitagawa T; Miyake T; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 May; 23(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 29395806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical Efficacy and Rehabilitation of Microscopic "Over the Top" for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
    Lv B; Sun S; Wang H; Xiao L; Xu T; Ji P; Yuan J; Ding H; Xie J; Meng N; Zhang L; Hu M; Jiang Q; Wang L; Yao X
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7174354. PubMed ID: 33490252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Kovacs FM; Urrútia G; Alarcón JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):E1335-51. PubMed ID: 21311394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Loske S; Nüesch C; Byrnes KS; Fiebig O; Schären S; Mündermann A; Netzer C
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a survey among Dutch spine surgeons.
    Overdevest GM; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Jacobs WC; Peul WC
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 Nov; 156(11):2139-45. PubMed ID: 25096175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lumbar spinal stenosis - surgical outcome and the odds of revision-surgery: Is it all due to the surgeon?
    Melcher C; Paulus AC; Roßbach BP; Gülecyüz MF; Birkenmaier C; Schulze-Pellengahr CV; Teske W; Wegener B
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(6):1423-1434. PubMed ID: 35754243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk for adjacent segment and same segment reoperation after surgery for lumbar stenosis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
    Radcliff K; Curry P; Hilibrand A; Kepler C; Lurie J; Zhao W; Albert TJ; Weinstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):531-9. PubMed ID: 23154835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.