These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25845246)

  • 1. Changes in soft tissue profile using functional appliances in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Stamenković Z; Raičković V; Ristić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):12-5. PubMed ID: 25845246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes on facial profile in the mixed dentition, from natural growth and induced by Balters' bionator appliance.
    Landázuri DR; Raveli DB; dos Santos-Pinto A; Dib LP; Maia S
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 23916440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Changes of soft tissues in patients with functional and skeletal Angel Class Ⅲ malocclusion after FRⅢ appliance therapy].
    Zhang N; Wang S; Fan LF; Chen XM; Li XX
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2017 Dec; 26(6):658-661. PubMed ID: 29691566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft-tissue profile changes resulting from retraction of maxillary incisors.
    Talass MF; Talass L; Baker RC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):385-94. PubMed ID: 3472457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
    Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Gross U; Frye L; Kinzinger GSM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in lip contour following treatment of maxillary protrusion with esthetic orthodontic appliances.
    Lew KK
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 1419219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics.
    Singh GD
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Feb; 5(1):38-50. PubMed ID: 12071373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    De Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Ursi W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 May; 121(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12045763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.
    Battagel JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 2351200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment.
    Pancherz H; Anehus-Pancherz M
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 7957652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 21357655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental arch and cephalometric changes following treatment for class III malocclusion by means of the function regulator (FR-3) appliance.
    Kalavritinos M; Papadopoulos MA; Nasiopoulos A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Mar; 66(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 15827701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving lip aesthetics in the face profile after treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusion.
    Koniarova Z; Husarova R; Stefkova M; Spidlen M; Statelova D; Janickova M; Koniarova A
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2022; 123(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 35343750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.
    Malta LA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Faltin K; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19852634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies].
    Tanić T; Blažej Z; Mitić V
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(7-8):439-45. PubMed ID: 21980651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Maetevorakul S; Viteporn S
    Prog Orthod; 2016; 17():13. PubMed ID: 27135067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.