These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25845247)

  • 1. Application of digital radiography for measuring in clinical dental practice.
    Ilić DV; Stojanović L
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(1-2):16-22. PubMed ID: 25845247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tooth coronal index and pulp/tooth ratio in dental age estimation on digital panoramic radiographs-A comparative study.
    Jain S; Nagi R; Daga M; Shandilya A; Shukla A; Parakh A; Laheji A; Singh R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Aug; 277():115-121. PubMed ID: 28645095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
    Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic detection of accessory/lateral canals: use of RadioVisioGraphy and Hypaque.
    Scarfe WC; Fana CR; Farman AG
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 7673818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Micro-Computed Tomography and Digital Intraoral Radiography to Determine the Accuracy of Digital Radiographic Measurements of Mandibular Molar Teeth in Dogs.
    Marron L; Rawlinson J; McGilvray K; Prytherch B
    J Vet Dent; 2017 Dec; 34(4):248-258. PubMed ID: 28974160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M; Pitts NB
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy.
    Yokota ET; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):490-4. PubMed ID: 7714421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Clinical study of direct digital radiography in caries detection].
    Hu T; Tan H; Hong L; Wang H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jun; 18(3):171-3. PubMed ID: 12539670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tuned-aperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars.
    Barton DJ; Clark SJ; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Aug; 96(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 12931097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars. Part III. Anatomic features revealed by digital subtraction radiography.
    Fan W; Fan B; Gutmann JL; Fan M
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1187-90. PubMed ID: 18793917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment.
    Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 8(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15469443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
    Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
    Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic performance of radiovisiography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radiovisiography in basic mode and with magnification.
    Forner Navarro L; Llena Puy MC; García Godoy F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 Apr; 13(4):E261-5. PubMed ID: 18379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between subtraction radiography and conventional radiographic interpretation during long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy in Class II furcation defects.
    Cury PR; Araujo NS; Bowie J; Sallum EA; Jeffcoat MK
    J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 15455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method of gauging dental radiographs during treatment planning for dental implants.
    Anil S; Al-Ghamdi HS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Sep; 8(6):82-8. PubMed ID: 17846675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.