These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2584559)

  • 1. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT): 1989 and beyond.
    Ritchie JL; Cerqueira MD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Dec; 14(7):1700-1. PubMed ID: 2584559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exercise thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: what should we expect from SPECT?
    Williams KA; Lipton MJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 15(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 2299072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reverse redistribution of thallium-201.
    Maddahi J; Berman DS
    J Nucl Med; 1995 Jun; 36(6):1019-21. PubMed ID: 7769420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy: planar imaging versus SPECT.
    Ferlin G; Zanco P; Buchberger R; Saitta B; Borsato N
    J Nucl Med Allied Sci; 1988; 32(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 3262730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Assessment of thallium-201 late redistribution in exercise myocardial SPECT].
    Muto T
    Kaku Igaku; 1988 Jul; 25(7):639-46. PubMed ID: 3263526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative evaluation of some analyses of stress-redistribution thallium-201 myocardial SPECT for myocardial ischemia].
    Kojima Y; Murata H; Nishimura S
    Kaku Igaku; 1987 Oct; 24(10):1511-20. PubMed ID: 3502006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quantitative evaluation of thallium-201 myocardial single photon emission CT (SPECT): clinical application].
    Doi O; Yamamoto S; Mitsudo K; Fujino T; Matsunaga K; Nishihara Y; Awa J; Goto T; Hase T; Kin M
    Kaku Igaku; 1987 Mar; 24(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 3497295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Myocardial viability. What does it mean and how do we measure it?
    Gould KL
    Circulation; 1991 Jan; 83(1):333-5. PubMed ID: 1984890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status of nuclear cardiology techniques.
    Beller GA
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 1991 Jul; 16(7):451-535. PubMed ID: 1954752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radionuclide techniques for the assessment of myocardial viability.
    Skoufis E; McGhie AI
    Tex Heart Inst J; 1998; 25(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 9885104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rubidium-82 PET--essential or not?
    Burns RJ
    J Nucl Med; 1993 Oct; 34(10):1834. PubMed ID: 8410315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current and future developments in scintigraphy to assess myocardial perfusion and function.
    Lim A; Goldschlager N
    Am J Card Imaging; 1992 Mar; 6(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 10150085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Thallium imaging with single photon emission computed tomography.
    Iskandrian AS; Heo J; Askenase A; Segal BL; Helfant RH
    Am Heart J; 1987 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):852-65. PubMed ID: 3310567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts.
    DePuey EG; Garcia EV
    J Nucl Med; 1989 Apr; 30(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 2661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ischemic myocardial injury evaluated using positron emission tomography in children with coronary artery disease: comparison with thallium-201 SPECT].
    Yoshibayashi M; Tamaki N; Nishioka K; Matsumura M; Yonekura Y; Yamashita K; Konishi J; Ban T; Mikawa H
    J Cardiol; 1992; 22(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 1307567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quantitative representation of stress 201Tl myocardial single photon emission computed tomography].
    Yamamoto S; Doi O; Kawahara Y; Shigeyasu M; Mitsudo K
    Kaku Igaku; 1986 Feb; 23(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 3486992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value and limitations of myocardial scintigraphy].
    J Cardiol Suppl; 1989; 20():17-22. PubMed ID: 2605001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of diagnostic procedures on stratified populations: application on the quantification of thallium myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.
    Goris ML; Bretille J; Askienazy S; Purcell GP; Savelli V
    Am J Physiol Imaging; 1989; 4(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 2647110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Myocardial perfusion imaging with positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography: frequency and causes of disparate results.
    Marwick TH; Go RT; MacIntyre WJ; Saha GB; Underwood DA
    Eur Heart J; 1991 Oct; 12(10):1064-9. PubMed ID: 1782930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adenosine and exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging. The GE SPECT Multicenter Adenosine Study Group.
    Gupta NC; Esterbrooks DJ; Hilleman DE; Mohiuddin SM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 1732349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.