These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25845618)

  • 1. Qualitative point-of-care D-dimer testing compared with quantitative D-dimer testing in excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care.
    Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Geersing GJ; Büller HR; Moons KG; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC
    J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1004-9. PubMed ID: 25845618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excluding pulmonary embolism in primary care using the Wells-rule in combination with a point-of care D-dimer test: a scenario analysis.
    Lucassen WA; Douma RA; Toll DB; Büller HR; van Weert HC
    BMC Fam Pract; 2010 Sep; 11():64. PubMed ID: 20831834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Primary Care: Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of "Gestalt" and the Wells Rule.
    Hendriksen JM; Lucassen WA; Erkens PM; Stoffers HE; van Weert HC; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Geersing GJ
    Ann Fam Med; 2016 May; 14(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 27184993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the Wells clinical prediction rule for pulmonary embolism in older ambulatory adults.
    Schouten HJ; Geersing GJ; Oudega R; van Delden JJ; Moons KG; Koek HL
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 Nov; 62(11):2136-41. PubMed ID: 25366538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism using the Wells rule and qualitative D-dimer testing in primary care: prospective cohort study.
    Geersing GJ; Erkens PM; Lucassen WA; Büller HR; Cate HT; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Prins MH; Oudega R; van Weert HC; Stoffers HE
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6564. PubMed ID: 23036917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The original and simplified Wells rules and age-adjusted D-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    van Es N; Kraaijpoel N; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Den Exter PL; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Apr; 15(4):678-684. PubMed ID: 28106338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid quantitative D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort management study.
    Bates SM; Takach Lapner S; Douketis JD; Kearon C; Julian J; Parpia S; Schulman S; Weitz JI; Linkins LA; Crowther M; Lim W; Spencer FA; Lee AY; Gross PL; Ginsberg J
    J Thromb Haemost; 2016 Mar; 14(3):504-9. PubMed ID: 26707364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is stand-alone D-dimer testing safe to rule out acute pulmonary embolism?
    van Es N; van der Hulle T; Büller HR; Klok FA; Huisman MV; Galipienzo J; Di Nisio M
    J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Feb; 15(2):323-328. PubMed ID: 27873439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple decision rule including D-dimer to reduce the need for computed tomography scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    van Es J; Beenen LF; Douma RA; den Exter PL; Mos IC; Kaasjager HA; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Middeldorp S; Bossuyt PM
    J Thromb Haemost; 2015 Aug; 13(8):1428-35. PubMed ID: 25990714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.
    Douma RA; Mos IC; Erkens PM; Nizet TA; Durian MF; Hovens MM; van Houten AA; Hofstee HM; Klok FA; ten Cate H; Ullmann EF; Büller HR; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV;
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 154(11):709-18. PubMed ID: 21646554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
    Crane S; Jaconelli T; Eragat M
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Jun; 25(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 28002070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
    Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and clinical utility of the simplified Wells rule for assessing clinical probability for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism.
    Douma RA; Gibson NS; Gerdes VE; Büller HR; Wells PS; Perrier A; Le Gal G
    Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jan; 101(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 19132208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative diagnoses in patients in whom the GP considered the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
    Erkens PM; Lucassen WA; Geersing GJ; van Weert HC; Kuijs-Augustijn M; van Heugten M; Rietjens L; ten Cate H; Prins MH; Büller HR; Hoes AW; Moons KG; Oudega R; Stoffers HE
    Fam Pract; 2014 Dec; 31(6):670-7. PubMed ID: 25216665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
    Crawford F; Andras A; Welch K; Sheares K; Keeling D; Chappell FM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD010864. PubMed ID: 27494075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis.
    van Es N; van der Hulle T; van Es J; den Exter PL; Douma RA; Goekoop RJ; Mos IC; Galipienzo J; Kamphuisen PW; Huisman MV; Klok FA; Büller HR; Bossuyt PM
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Aug; 165(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 27182696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a Diagnostic Strategy Using an Elevated and Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Threshold on Thromboembolic Events in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Freund Y; Chauvin A; Jimenez S; Philippon AL; Curac S; Fémy F; Gorlicki J; Chouihed T; Goulet H; Montassier E; Dumont M; Lozano Polo L; Le Borgne P; Khellaf M; Bouzid D; Raynal PA; Abdessaied N; Laribi S; Guenezan J; Ganansia O; Bloom B; Miró O; Cachanado M; Simon T
    JAMA; 2021 Dec; 326(21):2141-2149. PubMed ID: 34874418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis.
    Pasha SM; Klok FA; Snoep JD; Mos IC; Goekoop RJ; Rodger MA; Huisman MV
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e123-7. PubMed ID: 19942258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside with low pre-test probability and D-dimer: safety and clinical utility of 4 methods to assign pre-test probability.
    Carrier M; Wells PS; Rodger MA
    Thromb Res; 2006; 117(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 15893807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study.
    Kruip MJ; Slob MJ; Schijen JH; van der Heul C; Büller HR
    Arch Intern Med; 2002 Jul; 162(14):1631-5. PubMed ID: 12123408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.