These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25846043)

  • 41. Ethical issues in a study of Internet use: uncertainty, responsibility, and the spirit of research relationships.
    Bier MC; Sherblom SA; Gallo MA
    Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 11654970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Science ethics education part II: changes in attitude toward scientific fraud among medical researchers after a short course in science ethics.
    Vuckovic-Dekic L; Gavrilovic D; Kezic I; Bogdanovic G; Brkic S
    J BUON; 2012; 17(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 22740224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of a cartoon-based knowledge dissemination intervention on scientific and ethical challenges raised by nutrigenomics/nutrigenetics research.
    Lafrenière D; Hurlimann T; Menuz V; Godard B
    Eval Program Plann; 2014 Oct; 46():103-14. PubMed ID: 24973757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Confidentiality issues in psychological research.
    Peterson CC; Siddle DA
    Aust Psychol; 1995 Nov; 30(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 17144059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. HIV-AIDS patients' evaluation of health information on the internet: the digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims.
    Benotsch EG; Kalichman S; Weinhardt LS
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2004 Dec; 72(6):1004-11. PubMed ID: 15612847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease.
    Arar NH; Hazuda H; Steinbach R; Arar MY; Abboud HE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 16157258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Practical advice for conducting ethical online experiments and questionnaires for United States psychologists.
    Barchard KA; Williams J
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1111-28. PubMed ID: 19001403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
    Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ethics and governance for internet-based conservation science research.
    Thompson RM; Hall J; Morrison C; Palmer NR; Roberts DL
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1747-1754. PubMed ID: 34057267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Your mission is ... academic fraud and theft are a growing problem as researchers struggle to keep to an ethical code that is never talked about. Now some of science's top names are taking up the fight to keep the profession honest.
    Cohen P
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):38-41. PubMed ID: 11657935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Disclosing conflicts of interest to research subjects: an ethical and legal analysis.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2004; 11(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 15675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Financial capacity in persons with schizophrenia and serious mental illness: clinical and research ethics aspects.
    Marson DC; Savage R; Phillips J
    Schizophr Bull; 2006 Jan; 32(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16293810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ethical issues in the documentary data analysis of Internet posts and archives.
    Sixsmith J; Murray CD
    Qual Health Res; 2001 May; 11(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 11339083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. When experiments go wrong: the U.S. perspective.
    Capron AM
    J Clin Ethics; 2004; 15(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 15202353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Data integrity in an online world: Demonstration of multimodal bot screening tools and considerations for preserving data integrity in two online social and behavioral research studies with marginalized populations.
    Guy AA; Murphy MJ; Zelaya DG; Kahler CW; Sun S
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39250292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ethical use of social media to facilitate qualitative research.
    Lunnay B; Borlagdan J; McNaughton D; Ward P
    Qual Health Res; 2015 Jan; 25(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 25212856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reasons for and reservations about research participation in acutely injured adults.
    Irani E; Richmond TS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2015 Mar; 47(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 25599886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Primary health-care nurses and Internet health information-seeking: Access, barriers and quality checks.
    Gilmour J; Strong A; Chan H; Hanna S; Huntington A
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2016 Feb; 22(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 25355072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Overcoming Challenges of Online Research: Measures to Ensure Enrollment of Eligible Participants.
    Campbell CK; Ndukwe S; Dubé K; Sauceda JA; Saberi P
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2022 Oct; 91(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 36094490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Preventing and Protecting Against Internet Research Fraud in Anonymous Web-Based Research: Protocol for the Development and Implementation of an Anonymous Web-Based Data Integrity Plan.
    Hohn KL; Braswell AA; DeVita JM
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Sep; 11(9):e38550. PubMed ID: 36094806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.