219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25846254)
1. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
Canullo L; Cocchetto R; Marinotti F; Oltra DP; Diago MP; Loi I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Hess T; Zhang H; Chung KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
Sancho-Puchades M; Crameri D; Özcan M; Sailer I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CHF; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
Linkevicius T; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L; Maslova N; Puriene A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins.
Rayyan MM; Makarem HA
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):840-842. PubMed ID: 27460328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative in vitro study of cementing techniques for implant-supported restorations.
Liang T; Hu X; Zhu L; Pan X; Zhou Y; Liu J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jul; 116(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26946915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Novel Universal Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Crowns with Subgingival Margins.
Bhushan P; Aras MA; Chitre V; Mysore AR; Daswani SR
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):628-632. PubMed ID: 26861492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Factors Influencing Removal of the Cement Excess in Implant-Supported Restorations.
Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Maslova N; Linkeviciene L; Peciuliene V; Linkevicius T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 17(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 24224895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant-supported restorations?: An in vitro study.
Gönder A; Polat S; Kılıçarslan MA; Ocak M; Tamam E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):807-814. PubMed ID: 37232125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cementing an Implant Crown: A Novel Measurement System Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach.
Wadhwani C; Goodwin S; Chung KH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 25196982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cleaning Efficacy of Poly-ether-ether-ketone Tips in Eliminating Cement Remnants Around Implants With Different Abutment Heights.
Koyuncuoglu CZ; Kara HB; Akdemir S; Demir B; Husain NA; Özcan M
J Oral Implantol; 2020 Dec; 46(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 33494100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
Kim HJ; Karasan D; Park K; Kwon HB; Han JS; Lee JH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Luting Materials and Methods and the Restoration Surface on the Amount of Cement Remnants in Implant Restorations.
Lee JH; Yang SE; Lee J; Lee SY
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):301-307. PubMed ID: 31008680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement.
Korsch M; Obst U; Walther W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):797-802. PubMed ID: 23600620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimizing excess cement in implant-supported fixed restorations using an extraoral replica technique: a prospective 1-year study.
Frisch E; Ratka-Krüger P; Weigl P; Woelber J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 26574860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cemented implant restoration: A technique for minimizing adverse biologic consequences.
Galván G; Kois JC; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 26119018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of collar height of definitive restoration and type of luting cement on the amount of residual cement in implant restorations: A clinical study.
Ayyadanveettil P; Thavakkara V; Koodakkadavath S; Thavakkal A
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 34116840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
