BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25846558)

  • 1. Seclusion and the importance of contextual factors: An innovation project revisited.
    Boumans CE; Egger JI; Bouts RA; Hutschemaekers GJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 25846558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Professionals' attitudes after a seclusion reduction program: anything changed?
    Mann-Poll PS; Smit A; van Doeselaar M; Hutschemaekers GJ
    Psychiatr Q; 2013 Mar; 84(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22610382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nurses' decision on seclusion: patient characteristics, contextual factors and reflexivity in teams.
    Boumans CE; Egger JI; Souren PM; Mann-Poll PS; Hutschemaekers GJ
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2012 Apr; 19(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 22074324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Staff perceptions and organizational factors as predictors of seclusion and restraint on psychiatric wards.
    De Benedictis L; Dumais A; Sieu N; Mailhot MP; Létourneau G; Tran MA; Stikarovska I; Bilodeau M; Brunelle S; Côté G; Lesage AD
    Psychiatr Serv; 2011 May; 62(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 21532073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature.
    Happell B; Harrow A
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2010 Jun; 19(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 20550639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain?
    Janssen WA; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Hoogendoorn AW; Smit A; Widdershoven GA
    Psychiatr Q; 2013 Mar; 84(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 22581029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.
    Holmes D; Kennedy SL; Perron A
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2004 Sep; 25(6):559-78. PubMed ID: 15371143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
    Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of empathy of nursing staff with reduction of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care.
    Yang CP; Hargreaves WA; Bostrom A
    Psychiatr Serv; 2014 Feb; 65(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 24492902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of staffing levels on the use of seclusion.
    Janssen W; Noorthoorn E; Linge Rv; Lendemeijer B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 17141871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-sectional study on nurses' attitudes regarding coercive measures: the importance of socio-demographic characteristics, job satisfaction, and strategies for coping with stress.
    Bregar B; Skela-Savič B; Kores Plesničar B
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):171. PubMed ID: 29866142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital.
    Donat DC
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Aug; 54(8):1119-23. PubMed ID: 12883139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nurses' ethical perceptions about coercion.
    Lind M; Kaltiala-Heino R; Suominen T; Leino-Kilpi H; Välimäki M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2004 Aug; 11(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 15255910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors contributing to mental health professionals' decision to use seclusion.
    Mann-Poll PS; Smit A; de Vries WJ; Boumans CE; Hutschemaekers GJ
    Psychiatr Serv; 2011 May; 62(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 21532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities: review of the literature.
    Gaskin CJ; Elsom SJ; Happell B
    Br J Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 191():298-303. PubMed ID: 17906239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ethnomethodological analysis of the use of seclusion.
    Mason T
    J Adv Nurs; 1997 Oct; 26(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 9354992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scratching beneath the surface: influencing factors on nurses' attitudes toward the use of seclusion.
    Happell B; Koehn S
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2011; 32(7):449-56. PubMed ID: 21736468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Seclusion as a necessary intervention: the relationship between burnout, job satisfaction and therapeutic optimism and justification for the use of seclusion.
    Happell B; Koehn S
    J Adv Nurs; 2011 Jun; 67(6):1222-31. PubMed ID: 21261695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staffing levels and seclusion use.
    Morrison P; Lehane M
    J Adv Nurs; 1995 Dec; 22(6):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 8675875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implementing seclusion in forensic mental health care: A qualitative study of staff decision making.
    Green R; Shelly C; Gibb J; Walker T
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2018 Oct; 32(5):764-768. PubMed ID: 30201206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.